Answer: The most likely partial pressures are 98.7MPa for NO₂ and 101.3MPa for N₂O₄
Explanation: To determine the partial pressures of each gas after the increase of pressure, it can be used the equilibrium constant Kp.
For the reaction 2NO₂ ⇄ N₂O₄, the equilibrium constant is:
Kp = 
where:
P(N₂O₄) and P(NO₂) are the partial pressure of each gas.
Calculating constant:
Kp = 
Kp = 0.0104
After the weights, the total pressure increase to 200 MPa. However, at equilibrium, the constant is the same.
P(N₂O₄) + P(NO₂) = 200
P(N₂O₄) = 200 - P(NO₂)
Kp =
0.0104 = ![\frac{200 - P(NO_{2}) }{[P(NO_{2} )]^{2}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B200%20-%20P%28NO_%7B2%7D%29%20%20%7D%7B%5BP%28NO_%7B2%7D%20%29%5D%5E%7B2%7D%7D)
0.0104![[P(NO_{2} )]^{2}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BP%28NO_%7B2%7D%20%29%5D%5E%7B2%7D)
+ 
- 200 = 0
Resolving the second degree equation:
= 
= 98.7
Find partial pressure of N₂O₄:
P(N₂O₄) = 200 - P(NO₂)
P(N₂O₄) = 200 - 98.7
P(N₂O₄) = 101.3
The partial pressures are = 98.7 MPa and P(N₂O₄) = 101.3 MPa
An an increase in
temperature lead to more effective collisions between reactant particles and an
increase in the rate of a chemical reaction because the number of
molecules with sufficient energy to react increases. The answer is number 3.
Answer:
18 O, 17 O, and 16 O
Explanation:
three naturally stable isotopes
Yes it could, but you'd have to set up the process very carefully.
I see two major challenges right away:
1). Displacement of water would not be a wise method, since rock salt
is soluble (dissolves) in water. So as soon as you start lowering it into
your graduated cylinder full of water, its volume would immediately start
to decrease. If you lowered it slowly enough, you might even measure
a volume close to zero, and when you pulled the string back out of the
water, there might be nothing left on the end of it.
So you would have to choose some other fluid besides water ... one in
which rock salt doesn't dissolve. I don't know right now what that could
be. You'd have to shop around and find one.
2). Whatever fluid you did choose, it would also have to be less dense
than rock salt. If it's more dense, then the rock salt just floats in it, and
never goes all the way under. If that happens, then you have a tough
time measuring the total volume of the lump.
So the displacement method could perhaps be used, in principle, but
it would not be easy.
