Science is an art, u cant make art without creativity
Answer:
b
Explanation:
The space shuttle, in circular orbit around the Earth, collides with a small asteroid which ends up in the shuttle's storage bay.
This form of collision is called inelastic collision. And inelastic collision momentum is conserved but the kinetic energy is not conserved. Hence the correct option is b. only momentum is conserved.
Answer:
n = 5 approx
Explanation:
If v be the velocity before the contact with the ground and v₁ be the velocity of bouncing back
= e ( coefficient of restitution ) = 
and
h₁ is height up-to which the ball bounces back after first bounce.
From the two equations we can write that
So on
= .00396
Taking log on both sides
- n / 2 = log .00396
n / 2 = 2.4
n = 5 approx
Answer:
a) 
, b) 
, c) 
Explanation:
a) The change in the gravitational potential energy of the marble-Earth system is:
b) The change in the elastic potential energy of the spring is equal to the change in the gravitational potential energy, then:
c) The spring constant of the gun is:
Wow ! I understand your shock. I shook and vibrated a little
when I looked at this one too.
The reason for our shock is all the extra junk in the question,
put there just to shock and distract us.
"Neutron star", "5.5 solar masses", "condensed burned-out star".
That's all very picturesque, and it excites cosmic fantasies in
out brains when we read it, but it's just malicious decoration.
It only gets in the way, and doesn't help a bit.
The real question is:
What is the acceleration of gravity 2000 m from
the center of a mass of 1.1 x 10³¹ kg ?
Acceleration of gravity is
G · M / R²
= (6.67 x 10⁻¹¹ N·m²/kg²) · (1.1 x 10³¹ kg) / (2000 m)²
= (6.67 x 10⁻¹¹ · 1.1 x 10³¹ / 4 x 10⁶) (N) · m² · kg / kg² · m²
= 1.83 x 10¹⁴ (kg · m / s²) · m² · kg / kg² · m²
= 1.83 x 10¹⁴ m / s²
That's about 1.87 x 10¹³ times the acceleration of gravity on
Earth's surface.
In other words, if I were standing on the surface of that neutron star,
I would weigh 1.82 x 10¹² tons, give or take.
