True, it would slow down.
Answer:
Oxidation by FAD
Explanation:
1. Oxidation by NAD⁺
Succinate ⇌ Fumarate + <u>2H⁺ + 2e⁻</u>; E°´ = -0.031 V
<u>NAD⁺ + </u><u>2H⁺ + 2e⁻</u><u> ⇌ NADH + H⁺; </u> E°´ = <u> -0.320 V</u>
Succinate + NAD⁺ ⇌ Fumarate + NADH + H⁺; E°' = -0.351 V
2. Oxidation by FAD
Succinate ⇌ Fumarate + 2H⁺ + 2e⁻; E°´ = -0.031 V
<u>FAD + 2H⁺ + 2e⁻ ⇌ FADH₂; </u> E°´ = <u>-0.219 V
</u>
Succinate + FADH₂ ⇌ Fumarate + FAD; E°' = -0.250 V
Neither reaction is energetically favourable, but FAD has a more positive half-cell potential.
FAD is the stronger oxidizing agent.
The oxidation by FAD has a more positive cell potential, so it is more favourable energetically.
Answer:
<u>Gay-Lussac's law.</u>
Explanation:
According to Gay-Lussac's pressure law, it states that the pressure of a given mass of gas is <em>directly</em> proportional to the absolute temperature of the gas, the assumption that the volume is kept constant.
Hence, the trucker's tires were blown up because they were under high pressure as he drove from New Jersey to California, as a result of this intense pressure the temperature of the air in the tires began to rise and it directly affected the pressure of the gas in the tires' tubes which also increased to a point that they ended up blowing out, obeying Gay-Lussac's law.
