Answer:
y = 4
since you cant have y = 0x + 4, you drop the x and have a straight line (slope of 0) that runs all along the y point of 4.
The graph that represents the inequality has been shown in the attachment.
<h3>How to solve for the graph</h3>
We have these equations
y ≤ −3x + 1
y ≤ x + 3
We remove the inequality sign from both of these equations
y = −3x + 1
y = x + 3
−3x + 1 = x + 3
such that
x = -0.5
we use this value for x in any of the equations
x + 3 = -0.5 + 3
= 2.5
the point of intersection is at 2.5, -0.5
we test for the origin. 0,0
3x + 1
= 3*0 + 1
= 1
for x + 3
0+3 = 3
This is 0≤1 and 0≤3
Hence the graph should be shaded to the origin.
Read more on a graph here: brainly.com/question/14030149
#SPJ1
Answer: 31,948.80
Step-by-step explanation: I thin it his is correct. I multiplied the original amount by .04 then subtracted that from the original number.
Answer:
-1/2
Step-by-step explanation:
pass (0,1) (2,0)
slope = rise/run = -1/2
Answer:
C. Kalena made a mistake in Step 3. The justification should state: -x²
+ x²
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the function x(x - 1)(x + 1) = x3 - X
To justify kelena proof
We will need to show if the two equations are equal.
Starting from the RHS with function x³-x
First we will factor out the common factor which is 'x' to have;
x(x²-1)
Factorising x²-1 using the difference of two square will give;
x(x+1)(x-1)
Note that for two real number a and b, the expansion of a²-b² using difference vof two square will give;
a²-b² = (a+b)(a-b) hence;
Factorising x²-1 using the difference of two square will give;
x(x+1)(x-1)
Factorising x(x+1) gives x²+x, therefore
x(x+1)(x-1) = (x²+x)(x-1)
(x²+x)(x-1) = x³-x²+x²-x
The function x³-x²+x²-x gotten shows that kelena made a mistake in step 3, the justification should be -x²+x² not -x-x²