False because particles stop moving or study slow down.
I believe this question has the following five choices to
choose from:
>an SN2 reaction has occurred with inversion of
configuration
>racemization followed by an S N 2 attack
>an SN1 reaction has taken over resulting in inversion
of configuration
>an SN1 reaction has occurred due to carbocation
formation
>an SN1 reaction followed by an S N 2 “backside”
attack
The correct answer is:
an SN1 reaction has occurred due to carbocation formation
Answer:
28.43 min
Explanation:
Using integrated rate law for first order kinetics as:
![[A_t]=[A_0]e^{-kt}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BA_t%5D%3D%5BA_0%5De%5E%7B-kt%7D)
Where,
![[A_t]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BA_t%5D)
is the concentration at time t
![[A_0]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BA_0%5D)
is the initial concentration
Given that:
The rate constant, k = 
min⁻¹
Initial concentration = 0.1 M
Final concentration = 
M
Time = ?
Applying in the above equation, we get that:-
most events like the rising and setting of the Sun were used a natural measurement of time until recently.
Solar time, which is based on the motion of the Sun, is not the only way of measuring time, however. One might keep track of the regular appearance of the full Moon. That event occurs once about every 29.5 solar days. The time between appearances of new moons, then, could be used to define a month.
One also can use the position of the stars for measuring time. The system is the same as that used for the Sun, since the Sun itself is a star. All other stars also rise and set on a regular basis.
Although any one of these systems is a satisfactory method for measuring some unit of time, such as a day or a month, the systems may conflict with each other. It is not possible, for example, to fit 365 solar days into 12 or 13 lunar months exactly. This problem creates the need for leap years
Read more: http://www.scienceclarified.com/Ti-Vi/Time.html#ixzz5e1E705sr
I abbreviated most of it but there is a ton more at this link if you still need more.
