1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Pachacha [2.7K]
3 years ago
8

Help me with this please ​

Physics
2 answers:
Usimov [2.4K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Sorry is there any attachments to put with this question, If please publish question properly please so that brainly answerers will know what to answer.

Rina8888 [55]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Where is the Question?

Explanation:

I am glad to h help you out.

You might be interested in
A 10kg box is sliding at 50m/s. Find the momentum
MAXImum [283]

Answer:

The momentum of the ball is 500 kg·m/s

Explanation:

The momentum is given by Mass × Velocity

The given parameters are;

The mass of the box = 10 kg

The velocity by which the box is sliding = 50 m/s

Therefore, the momentum of the ball is given as follows;

The momentum of the ball = 10 kg × 50 m/s = 500 kg·m/s

The momentum of the ball = 500 kg·m/s

5 0
2 years ago
Assuming both graduated cylinders are holding water at room temperature, which cylinder has more thermal energy?
natta225 [31]

Answer:

The correct option is;

The graduate cylinder with more water has more thermal energy because it is holding more water molecules

Explanation:

Given that the thermal energy of the system is the energy possessed by the system by virtue of the increased motion of the particles by virtue of a transfer  of heat, when the content of the system is heated

The thermal energy, Q is given by the following equation;

Q = Mass, m × The specific heat capacity, C × The change in temperature, ΔT

Given that the graduated cylinder with more water has more mass and therefore, more water molecules, than the cylinder with less water, the cylinder with more water has more thermal energy.

3 0
3 years ago
Why would the planets move in a straight path if there was no gravitational energy from the sun​
omeli [17]

Explanation:

The sun's gravitational force is very strong. If it were not, a planet would move in a straight line out into space. The sun's gravity pulls the planet toward the sun, which changes the straight line of direction into a curve. This keeps the planet moving in an orbit around the sun

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Suppose you monitor a large number (many thousands) of stars over a period of 3 years, searching for planets through the transit
nasty-shy [4]

Answer:

2. You must be able to precisely measure variations in the star's brightness with time.

5. As seen from Earth, the planet's orbit must be seen nearly edge–on (in the plane of our line-of-sight).

6. You must repeatedly obtain spectra of the star that the planet orbits.

Explanation:

The transit method is a very important and effective tool for discovering new exoplanets (the planets orbiting other stars out of the solar system). In this method the stars are observed for a long duration. When the exoplanet will cross in front of theses stars as seen from Earth, the brightness of the star will dip. To observe this dip following conditions must be met:

1. The orbit of the planet should be co-planar with the plane of our line of sight. Then only its transition can be observed.

2. The brightness of the star must be observed precisely as the period of transit can be less than a second as seen from Earth. Also the dip in brightness depends on the size of the planet. If the planet is not that big the intensity dip will be very less.

3. The spectrum of the star needs to be studied and observe during the transit and normally to find out the details about the planets.

4. Also, the orbital period should be less than the period of observation for the transit to occur at least once.

4 0
3 years ago
A beam of electrons passes through a single slit, and a beam of protons passes through a second, but identical, slit. The electr
ryzh [129]

Answer:

(b) The electrons, because they have the smaller momentum and, hence, the larger de Broglie wavelength

Explanation:

de Broglie wavelength λ = h / m v

Since both electrons and protons have same velocity , momentum mv will be less for electrons because mass of electron is less .

for electron , momentum is less so  . Therefore de Broglie wavelength λ will be more for electrons .

Amount of diffraction that is angle of diffraction is proportional to λ

Therefore electrons having greater de Broglie wavelength will show greater diffraction.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • A book is sitting on a shelf that is 3.0 meters off the ground. Kinetic energy is found using the formula 1/2 times mass times s
    14·1 answer
  • How much force is needed to accelerate a 100 kg mass at a rate of 2.5 m/s^2
    5·1 answer
  • A cubical wooden box floating on water rises 1cm when 400 gm of stone is
    9·1 answer
  • What is the smallest gravity in solar system?
    10·2 answers
  • Which element is the most reactive nonmetal
    15·2 answers
  • WILL MARK BRAINLIST IIF U GIVE ME CORRECT ANSWERS
    15·2 answers
  • In a double-slit experiment, the second-order bright fringe is observed at an angle of 0.61°. If the slit separation is 0.11 mm,
    10·1 answer
  • Which of these can produce an electric current?Required to answer. Single choice.
    14·1 answer
  • SKILL LEVEL:
    5·1 answer
  • The principles that you will examine in this lab can be illustrated by studying a falling bucket. Imagine a frictionless pulley
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!