Explanation:
the object has constant velocity for 2 seconds and it get a constant accelration (2ms-2)
If the angle is either 0 or 180, that means that there is either negative or positive work, so A and D are not correct.
If the angle is 45, then there is still some work involved.
The only option where there is no work done by a force is B. when the angle is between the force and displacement is 90.
All are examples of electromagnetic energy except <span>circles forming when a rock drops into a pool. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the third option or option "C". The other choices can be negated. I hope that this is the answer that has actually come to your help.</span>
Answer:42.43m/s
Explanation:According to vf=vi+at, we can calculate it since v0 equals to 0. vf=0+9.8m/s^2*4.33s= 42.434m/s
Answer:
explanation of this effect is the photoelectric effect
Explanation:
Let's describe the process, when light of large wavelength falls, this implies a small energy, according to Planck's equation
E = h f =
the energy of the photons is not enough to carry out an electronic transition between two states of the material, when we decrease the wavelength (the energy of the photons increases), the point is reached where the energy of the beam is equal to some energy of a transition, by which the electrons are promoted and since we can see a certain charge, as the atoms are neutral, some electrons must be removed from the material, this is represented in the macroscopic case as the work function of the material, consequently a unbalanced load that is what we can measure.
When we increase the lightning intensity, what we do is that we increase the number of photons and if each photon can remove an electron, by removing the electrons the difference between it and the positive charge (fixed in the nuclei) increases.
We can analyze the interaction of the photon and the electron as a particular collision.
The explanation of this effect was made by Einstein in his explained of the photoelectric effect