1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
S_A_V [24]
2 years ago
9

Explain how scientist learned about the magnetic poles of the Earth.

Physics
2 answers:
Makovka662 [10]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

there are many way but this may help

Explanation:

The tendency of a magnet to align itself in a north-south direction, so giving a magnetic compass, was discovered by the Chinese about 2000 years ago. Then in 1600 William Gilbert published De Magnete, in which he concluded that the earth behaved as a giant magnet. ...

maks197457 [2]2 years ago
4 0

Answer: Larmor suggested in 1919 that a self-exciting dynamo could explain the magnetic field of the earth, as well as that of the sun and other stars, but it was Elsasser and Bullard in the 1940s who showed how motion in the liquid core of the earth might produce a self-sustaining magnetic field. By this time seismology and other studies had given a clearer picture of the earth, as having a solid inner core, a liquid outer core, both with a composition more of metal (mainly iron) than rock, and a rocky mantle, all below a thin crust that is all we can directly see. Energy from radioactivity travels outwards as heat, producing thermal convection in the core. It seems that this convection is the cause of the earth's magnetic field, although our knowledge of the core and its dynamics is sketchy. Our knowledge is limited to saying that flow regimes like those that may be occurring in the core can produce self-sustaining dynamos, with characteristics similar to that needed to produce the earth’s magnetic field.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
A ball is thrown straight up from the ground with an unknown velocity. It reaches its highest point after 5.5 s. With what veloc
Maslowich
V = u + at
0 = u -9.8 x 5.5
u = 9.8 x 5.5 = 53.9 m/s
5 0
3 years ago
The potential difference between two equipotential lines 5.0 mm apart has a value of 1.2 V, calculate the electric field value.
jonny [76]

Answer:

The electric field value is 240 N/C

Explanation:

Given that,

Distance = 5.0 mm

Potential difference = 1.2 V

We need to calculate the electric field value

Using formula of potential difference

\Delta V=Ed

E=\dfrac{\Delta V}{d}

Where, E = electric field

V = potential difference

d = distance

Put the value into the formula

E=\dfrac{1.2}{5.0\times10^{-3}}

E= 240\ N/C

Hence, The electric field value is 240 N/C

6 0
3 years ago
A book sits on a bookshelf without moving until a student picks it up. Which law best explains why the book remains at rest unti
svetoff [14.1K]

Answer:

Newtons first law

Explanation:

object in rest stays at rest

object in motion stays in motion

8 0
3 years ago
A disk of mass M and radius R rotates at angular velocity ω0. Another disk of mass M and radius r is dropped on top of the rotat
AleksandrR [38]

Answer:

\omega = \frac{(R^2\omega_o}{(R^2 + r^2)}

Explanation:

As we know that there is no external torque on the system of two disc

then the angular momentum of the system will remains conserved

So we will have

L_i = L_f

now we have

L_i = (\frac{1}{2}MR^2)\omega_o

also we have

L_f = (\frac{1}{2}MR^2 + \frac{1}{2}Mr^2)\omega

now from above equation we have

(\frac{1}{2}MR^2)\omega_o  = (\frac{1}{2}MR^2 + \frac{1}{2}Mr^2)\omega

now we have

\omega = \frac{MR^2\omega_o}{(MR^2 + Mr^2)}

\omega = \frac{(R^2\omega_o}{(R^2 + r^2)}

6 0
3 years ago
John and Caroline go out for a walk one day. This graph represents their distance from home.
Serga [27]

Answer:

Option C is the correct answer.

Explanation:

  We have velocity of a body = Change in position/ Time.

  Considering first portion of graph,

  Change in position = 30 - 0 = 30 m

  Time = 0.75 hours = 45 minutes = 2700 seconds

   Velocity = 30/2700 = 0.011 m/s

  Considering second portion of graph,

  Change in position = 30 - 30 = 0 m

  Time = 0.5 hours = 30 minutes = 1800 seconds

   Velocity = 0/1800 = 0 m/s

 Considering third portion of graph,

  Change in position = 0 - 30 = -30 m

  Time = 0.75 hours = 45 minutes = 2700 seconds

   Velocity = -30/2700 = -0.011 m/s

So firstly they walked in one direction(positive direction), then they were still(velocity is zero), then they walked in the opposite direction( velocity is negative).

Option C is the correct answer.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How could you keep an object's acceleration the same if the force acting on the object were doubled?
    5·2 answers
  • A child attaches a rubber ball to a string and whirls it around in a circle overhead. If the string is 0.2m long and the ball's
    12·1 answer
  • What is the wavelength of an earthquake wave if it has a speed of 7 km/s and a frequency of 12 Hz?
    7·1 answer
  • Which statement correctly describes earths magnetic field? <br> 20 point question!!!!
    12·1 answer
  • When drawing up liquid into a micropipette, put the tip in the liquid at a Choose... degree angle, push the plunger to the Choos
    5·1 answer
  • A water tower is idealized as a mass M on top of a uniform and massless beam. The bottom end of the beam is fixed to the ground.
    10·1 answer
  • Write three example for types of energy​
    6·2 answers
  • A 5.0 g coin is placed 15 cm from the center of a turntable. The coin has static and kinetic coefficients of friction with the t
    5·1 answer
  • Q1 what is the direction of current?​
    6·1 answer
  • Why is physics worth knowing about
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!