1) Focal length
We can find the focal length of the mirror by using the mirror equation:

(1)
where
f is the focal length

is the distance of the object from the mirror

is the distance of the image from the mirror
In this case,

, while

(the distance of the image should be taken as negative, because the image is to the right (behind) of the mirror, so it is virtual). If we use these data inside (1), we find the focal length of the mirror:

from which we find

2) The mirror is convex: in fact, for the sign convention, a concave mirror has positive focal length while a convex mirror has negative focal length. In this case, the focal length is negative, so the mirror is convex.
3) The image is virtual, because it is behind the mirror and in fact we have taken its distance from the mirror as negative.
4) The radius of curvature of a mirror is twice its focal length, so for the mirror in our problem the radius of curvature is:
Answer:
The final velocity of the wooden block is equal to 
Explanation:
Given that mass of bullet =
Mass of wood = 
Initial velocity of bullet = 
Final velocity of bullet = 
Initial velocity of wood = o
Final velocity of wood = ![v_{w]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=v_%7Bw%5D)
Here momentum is conserved so initial momentum = final momentum
.
Upon substituting these values in above equation , we get
.
The answer is a matter of opinion, and you're going to get different answers
from different people. Here's <u>my</u> take on it:
The writers, producers and advertising sponsors of these shows certainly
don't think they're boring. And <em><u>definitely</u></em> neither do the TV networks that
decide which ones to broadcast.
I'm not trying to say "The experts don't think they're boring, so you must
be wrong". I'm trying to say that different people have different opinions
about the same shows, and in <em>your</em> case,<em> you</em> find them boring.
My conclusion is this:
I think you're finding TV shows boring nowadays because you're growing
as a person. You've grown, developed, and matured to the point where
you're above the level of audience that the shows are pitched for. That's
a very good thing !
You're sad because you used to get pleasure and entertainment from TV,
and now it doesn't give you those things. That's like losing an old friend,
that you used to have such fun playing with, but he just doesn't do it for
you any more.
Now that you've grown up, you've made new friends. With them, you do
things that you wouldn't even understand with your younger friends. And
you develop new interests, like ... I don't know ... books, movies, hobbies,
your church, your profession, learning new things, developing new skills,
exercising your brain, writing, volunteer work, ham radio, building fine
furniture, singing, learning to write music, raising tropical plants, sculpture,
politics ... whatever turns you on. Some people never grow past the stage
where staring at the tube is all they need in life, because they don't have
what it takes to be interested in anything else. Those are the people that
TV is aimed at. But you have more, and that's why TV isn't enough for you.
There are other possible reasons why TV bores you. But until I know more
about you, I think it's a very, very good sign.
Given the Hubble's constant, the approximate age of the universe is 5.88 × 10⁹ Years.
Given the data in the question;
Hubble's constant; 
Age of the universe; 
We know that, the reciprocal of the Hubble's constant (
) gives an estimate of the age of the universe (
). It is expressed as:

Now,
Hubble's constant; 
We know that;

so
![1\ Million\ light\ years = [9.46 * 10^{15}m] * 10^6 = 9.46 * 10^{21}m](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=1%5C%20Million%5C%20light%5C%20years%20%3D%20%5B9.46%20%2A%2010%5E%7B15%7Dm%5D%20%2A%2010%5E6%20%3D%209.46%20%2A%2010%5E%7B21%7Dm)
Therefore;

Now, we input this Hubble's constant value into our equation;

Therefore, given the Hubble's constant, the approximate age of the universe is 5.88 × 10⁹ Years.
Learn more: brainly.com/question/14019680