1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ulleksa [173]
3 years ago
14

Two identical speakers are emitting a constant tone that has a wavelength of 0.50 m. Speaker A is located to the left of speaker

B. At which of the following locations would complete destructive interference occur? a. 2.15 m from speaker A and 3.00 m from speaker B b. 2.50 m from speaker A and 1.00 m from speaker B c. 3.75 m from speaker A and 2.50 m from speaker B d. 1.35 m from speaker A and 3.75 m from speaker B e. 200 m from speaker A and 3.00 m from speaker B
Physics
1 answer:
Marianna [84]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

a) and c).

Explanation:

For a complete destructive interference occur, it must be met the following condition relating the wavelength, and the difference in the paths taken by the sound emitted by the sources until arriving to the listening point:

d = |dA- dB| = (2n-1)*(λ/2)

For n= 1,  d = λ/2 = 0.25 m, it doesn't meet any of the cases.

For n=2, d= 3*(λ/2) = 0.75 m

In the case a) we have dA = 2.15 m and dB = 3.00 m, so dB-dA = 0.75 m, which means that in the location stated by case a) a complete destructive interference would occur.

For n=3, d= 5*(λ/2) = 5*0.25 m = 1.25 m.

This is just the case c) because we have dA = 3.75 m and dB = 2.50 m, so dA-dB = 1.25 m, which means that in the location stated by case c) a complete destructive interference would occur also.

The remaining cases don't meet the condition stated above, so the statements found to be true are a) and c),

You might be interested in
How might deforestation lead to desertification
qwelly [4]
If we keep cutting down tree's and if there are enough forest fires then it will turn into a desert....Hope it helps! 
6 0
3 years ago
If Jerome is swinging on a rope and transferring energy from gravitational potential energy to kinetic energy, A)compression B)w
Gnesinka [82]
Salutations!

If Jerome is swinging on a rope and transferring energy from gravitational potential energy to kinetic energy,  _______________ is being done.

<span>If Jerome is swinging on a rope and transferring energy from gravitational potential energy to kinetic energy, work is being done. Energy being transferred and the object begins to move is called work.

Thus, your answer is option B.

Hope I helped (:

Have a great day!</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A positively charged particle moves through an electric field. As part of a complicated trajectory, the particle passes through
kow [346]

Answer:

(B) The speed is larger at A than at B.

Explanation:

Point B, the final point of the trajectory, has higher electric potential than point A, the initial point of the trajectory, so the electric potential energy of the charged particle increases, which means that its kinetic energy must be decreasing, thus the speed at B must be lower than the speed at A.

8 0
3 years ago
Which type of reaction does this diagram represent?
Sever21 [200]

Nuclear fusion because atomic nuclei combine to form a heavier nucleus. Option A is correct.

<h3>What is nuclear fusion?</h3>

The process by which two or more tiny nuclei unite to generate a bigger nucleus is known as a nuclear fusion reaction.

The more energy it takes to liberate an electron from a smaller atom. This is referred to as binding energy.

As a result, when two little nuclei fuse together, there is more binding energy than when two big nuclei fuse together.

For example, the fusion of two hydrogen atoms produces more energy than the fusion of one helium atom, and surplus energy is expelled into space upon binding.

Nuclear fusion because atomic nuclei combine to form a heavier nucleus.

Hence, option A is correct.

To learn more about nuclear fusion refer to the link;

brainly.com/question/14019172

#SPJ1

8 0
2 years ago
Rubber rods charged by rubbing with cat fur repel each other. Glass rods charged by rubbing with silk repel each other. A rubber
puteri [66]

Answer:

C. A rubber rod and a glass rod charged this way have opposite charges on them.

Explanation:

When a rubber rod is rubbed against cat fur, it acquires a negative charge, it becomes negatively charged.

When you then try to bring two rubber rod's together, they repel because like charges repel.

Meanwhile, when you rub a glass rod against silk, it loses electrons to the silk material and becomes positively charged.

When you bring two positively charged glass rod's together, they repel, because like charges repel.

However, when you bring the rubber rod and a glass rod together, the attract each other because unlike/opposite charges attract.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain the purpose of oxidation numbers?
    8·1 answer
  • What is the mass of a baseball that has a kinetic energy of 100 J and travel at 5 m/s
    14·2 answers
  • The broom hocket fame helps you work on what skill?
    10·1 answer
  • An object with a mass of 5.0 kg is accelerating toward the surface of Earth at a rate of 9.8 m/s^2
    10·1 answer
  • When titanium bonds with oxygen, the ionic compound that forms has the chemical formula Ti2O3 and consists of Ti3+ ions and O2-
    7·1 answer
  • The two cars collide at right angles in the intersection of two icy roads. Car A has a mass of 1965 kg and car B has a mass of 1
    13·1 answer
  • Please help I need help I can’t fail .
    13·1 answer
  • 50 N of force is exerted on a crate. It accelerates at a rate of 1.2 m/s/s. Calculate its mass
    7·1 answer
  • What is the density of iron if 5.0 cm^3 has a mass of 39.5 g
    11·2 answers
  • Which statement is the best explanation for the graph?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!