Explanation: You cannot be convicted of a crime without evidence. You cannot be convicted of a state crime. You cannot be convicted of a federal crime. If there is no evidence against you, under the law, it simply is not possible for the prosecutor's office to obtain a conviction at trial. So, when you do have evidence it is really impossible to not get convicted unless the judge truly believes your side of the story and declares you not guilty.
I hope this helped :) If not i'm sorry!
In every reaction, mass cannot be destroyed nor created as defined by the law of conservation of mass. Energy also cannot be destroyed when a chemical reaction takes place
<u>Answer:</u> The rate law expression for the given reaction is written below.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Rate law is defined as the expression which expresses the rate of the reaction in terms of molar concentration of the reactants with each term raised to the power their stoichiometric coefficient of that reactant in the balanced chemical equation.
For the given chemical equation:

Rate law expression for the reaction:
![\text{Rate}=k[NO]^2[H_2]^2](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Ctext%7BRate%7D%3Dk%5BNO%5D%5E2%5BH_2%5D%5E2)
Hence, the rate law expression for the given reaction is written above.
Answer:
a)
b)
Explanation:
a) The reaction:

The free-energy expression:

![E=E_{red}-E_{ox]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=E%3DE_%7Bred%7D-E_%7Box%5D)
The element wich is reduced is the Fe and the one that oxidates is the Mg:

The electrons transfered (n) in this reaction are 2, so:


b) If you have values of enthalpy and enthropy you can calculate the free-energy by:

with T in Kelvin


Answer:
1. The product has a higher Rf value on a silica gel TLC plate because it is more polar than the starting methyl benzoate.
2. False
3. True
Explanation:
In chromatography, there is a stationary phase and a mobile phase. The ratio of the distance moved by a component and the distance moved by the solvent gives the retention factor (Rf).
Since silica gel is a polar solvent, it will retain the more polar product methyl m-nitrobenzoate compared to the methyl benzoate starting material.
In comparing the electrophillic aromatic substitution of m-nitrobenzoate and methyl benzoate, we must remember that the presence of electron withdrawing groups (such as -NO2 and -CHO) on the aromatic compound deactivates the compound towards electrophillic aromatic substitution hence, methyl m-nitrobenzoate is less reactive than methyl benzoate in Electrophilic Aromatic Substition and Methyl benzoate is less reactive than benzene in Electrophilic Aromatic Substition