Con que otro nombre se le conoce a los delitos informaticos

A pressure gage at the inlet to a gas compressor indicates that the gage pressure is 40.0 kPa. Atmospheric pressure is 1.01 bar.

bonufazy [111]

Answer:

Given

inlet Pga =40kpa = 40000pa

Patm=1.01bar = 1.01 x 100000pa =101000pa

exit Pab= 6.5 (inlet Pab)

But generally, Pab = Patm + Pga

1. the absolute pressure of the gas at the inlet, inlet Pab?

inlet Pab = Patm + inlet Pga

= 101000pa + 40000pa = 141kpa

the absolute pressure of the gas at the inlet, inlet Pab = 141kpa

2. the gage pressure of the gas at the exit? exit Pga?

exit Pab = Patm + exit Pga

exit Pga = exit Pab - Patm

= (6.5 x 141kpa) - 101kpa

= 815.5kpa

the gage pressure of the gas at the exit exit Pga=815.5kpa

5 0

3 years ago

A pitfall cited in Section 1.10 is expecting to improve the overall performance of a computer by improving only one aspect of th

Oxana [17]

Answer:

a) For this case the new time to run the FP operation would be reduced 20% so that means 100-20% =80% from the original time

$(1-0.2)*70 s =56s$

The reduction on this case is $70-56 s=14s$

And since the new total time would be given by $250-14=236 s$

b) For this case the total time is reduced 20% so that means that the new total time would be (1-0.2)=0.8 times the original total time $(1-0.2) *250s =200 s$

The original time for INT operations is calculated as:

$250 = 70+85+40 +t_{INT}$

$t_{INT}=55s$

For this part the only time that was changed is assumed the INT operations so then:

$200 = 70+85+40 \Delta t_{INT}$

And then: $\Delta t_{INT}= 200-70-85-40=5 s$

c) A reduction of the total time implies that the total time would be 205 s from the results above. And the time for FP is 70, for L/S is 85 and for INT operations is 55 s, so then if we add 70+85+55=210s, we see that 210>205 so then we cannot reduce the total time 20% just reducing the branch intructions.

Explanation:

From the info given we know that a computer running a program that requires 250 s, with 70 s spent executing FP instructions, 85 s executed L/S instructions and 40 s spent executing branch instructions.

Part 1

For this case the new time to run the FP operation would be reduced 20% so that means 100-20% =80% from the original time

$(1-0.2)*70 s =56s$

The reduction on this case is $70-56 s=14s$

And since the new total time would be given by $250-14=236 s$

Part 2

For this case the total time is reduced 20% so that means that the new total time would be (1-0.2)=0.8 times the original total time $(1-0.2) *250s =200 s$

The original time for INT operations is calculated as:

$250 = 70+85+40 +t_{INT}$

$t_{INT}=55s$

For this part the only time that was changed is assumed the INT operations so then:

$200 = 70+85+40 \Delta t_{INT}$

And then: $\Delta t_{INT}= 200-70-85-40=5 s$

And we can quantify the decrease using the relative change:

$\% Change = \frac{5s}{55 s} *100 = 9.09\%$ of reduction

Part 3

A reduction of the total time implies that the total time would be 205 s from the results above. And the time for FP is 70, for L/S is 85 and for INT operations is 55 s, so then if we add 70+85+55=210s, we see that 210>205 so then we cannot reduce the total time 20% just reducing the branch intructions.

8 0

3 years ago

An alloy is evaluated for potential creep deformation in a short-term laboratory experiment. The creep rate (ϵ˙) is found to be

cupoosta [38]

Answer:

Activation energy for creep in this temperature range is Q = 252.2 kJ/mol

Explanation:

To calculate the creep rate at a particular temperature

creep rate, $\zeta_{\theta} = C \exp(\frac{-Q}{R \theta} )$

Creep rate at 800⁰C, $\zeta_{800} = C \exp(\frac{-Q}{R (800+273)} )$

$\zeta_{800} = C \exp(\frac{-Q}{1073R} )\\\zeta_{800} = 1 \% per hour =0.01\\$

$0.01 = C \exp(\frac{-Q}{1073R} )$ .........................(1)

Creep rate at 700⁰C

$\zeta_{700} = C \exp(\frac{-Q}{R (700+273)} )$

$\zeta_{800} = C \exp(\frac{-Q}{973R} )\\\zeta_{800} = 5.5 * 10^{-2} \% per hour =5.5 * 10^{-4}$

$5.5 * 10^{-4} = C \exp(\frac{-Q}{1073R} )$ .................(2)

Divide equation (1) by equation (2)

$\frac{0.01}{5.5 * 10^{-4} } = \exp[\frac{-Q}{1073R} -\frac{-Q}{973R} ]\\18.182= \exp[\frac{-Q}{1073R} +\frac{Q}{973R} ]\\R = 8.314\\18.182= \exp[\frac{-Q}{1073*8.314} +\frac{Q}{973*8.314} ]\\18.182= \exp[0.0000115 Q]\\$

Take the natural log of both sides

$ln 18.182= 0.0000115Q\\2.9004 = 0.0000115Q\\Q = 2.9004/0.0000115\\Q = 252211.49 J/mol\\Q = 252.2 kJ/mol$

3 0

3 years ago

. In one stroke of a reciprocating compressor, helium is isothermally and reversibly compressed in a piston + cylinder from 298

andriy [413]

Answer:

5.7058kj/mole

Explanation:

Please see attachment for step by step guide

5 0

3 years ago

Stream Piracy – Kaaterskill, NY. Check and double-click the Problem 15 folder. The dark blue and orange streams highlight the pr

baherus [9]

Answer:

b. The pirating streams are eroding headwardly to intersect more of the other streams’ drainage basins, causing water to be diverted down their steeper gradients.

Explanation:

From the Kaaterskill NY 15 minute map (1906), this shows two classic examples of stream capture.

The Kaaterskill Creek flow down the east relatively steep slopes into the Hudson River Valley. While, the Gooseberry Creek is a low gradient stream flowing down the west direction which in turn drains the higher parts of the Catskills in this area.

However, there is Headward erosion of Kaaterskill Creek which resulted to the capture of part of the headwaters of Gooseberry Creek.

The evidence for this is the presence of "barbed" (enters at obtuse rather than acute angle) tributary which enters Kaaterskill Creek from South Lake which was once a part of the Gooseberry Creek drainage system.

It should be noted again, that there is drainage divide between the Gooseberry and Kaaterskill drainage systems (just to the left of the word Twilight) which is located in the center of the valley.

As it progresses, this divide will then move westward as Kaaterskill captures more and more of the Gooseberry system.

5 0

3 years ago