Question

Pluto has been reassigned and is now a dwarf planet. Why did scientists think this reassignment was necessary? If you were a scientist at that time, would you be for or against the reassignment of Pluto? What evidence would you give to defend your choice?

Answer 1

I would not because Pluto is like the other planets even though that it is smaller that all the other planets and colder but I don’t think it was necessary

Answer 2

Answer:

Explanation:

we humans have our own ify classification for celestial objects, most people are saddened that pluto is not a planet anymore altho it hasn't changed at all.

scientist say that if an object is going to be considered a planet it must fill in these three checkboxes:

You must be spherical, you must orbit a star, and you must have already cleared your path or debris.

Pluto fills in the first two boxes but it does orbit in the keyperbelt and there are 5 other objects just like it. this is why pluto has been dubbed a dwarf planet.