First choice: the inability of current technology to capture
large amounts of the
Sun's energy
Well, it's true that large amounts of it get away ... our 'efficiency' at capturing it is still rather low. But the amount of free energy we're able to capture is still huge and significant, so this isn't really a major problem.
Second choice: the inability of current technology to store
captured solar
energy
No. We're pretty good at building batteries to store small amounts, or raising water to store large amounts. Storage could be better and cheaper than it is, but we can store huge amounts of captured solar energy right now, so this isn't a major problem either.
Third choice: inconsistencies in the availability of the resource
I think this is it. If we come to depend on solar energy, then we're
expectedly out of luck at night, and we may unexpectedly be out
of luck during long periods of overcast skies.
Fourth choice: lack of
demand for solar energy
If there is a lack of demand, it's purely a result of willful manipulation
of the market by those whose interests are hurt by solar energy.
Answer: A
Explanation:
honestly, it sounded the best
Answer:
m₁ / m₂ = 1.3
Explanation:
We can work this problem with the moment, the system is formed by the two particles
The moment is conserved, to simulate the system the particles initially move with a moment and suppose a shock where the particular that, without speed, this determines that if you center, you should be stationary, which creates a moment equal to zero
p₀o = m₁ v₁ + m₂ v₂
pf = 0
m₁ v₁ + m₂ v₂ = 0
m₁ / m₂ = -v₂ / v₁
m₁ / m₂= - (-6.2) / 4.7
m₁ / m₂ = 1.3
Another way to solve this exercise is to use the mass center relationship
Xcm = 1/M (m₁ x₁ + m₂ x₂)
We derive from time
Vcm = 1/M (m₁ v₁ + m₂v₂)
As they say the velocity of the center of zero masses
0 = 1/M (m₁ v₁ + m₂v₂)
m₁ v₁ + m₂v₂ = 0
m₁ / m₂ = -v₂ / v₁
m₁ / m₂ = 1.3
where:
F - force
m - mass
a - acceleration
We transform this formula to get a:
