<span>A. Exact ecological footprints are often difficult to calculate, but estimates can be useful in comparing populations.
</span>Which of the following could be said about ecological footprints? <u /> <u>Exact ecological footprints are often difficult to calculate, but estimates can be useful in comparing populations.</u><u />
NOT:
b. Ecological footprints can't be used to determine carrying capacity.
C. Ecological footprints don't take into account resources needed to absorb and manage wastes.
<span>D. The average ecological footprints for various countries are nearly identical.</span>
Answer:
![K_a=\frac{[H^+][A^-]}{[HA]}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=K_a%3D%5Cfrac%7B%5BH%5E%2B%5D%5BA%5E-%5D%7D%7B%5BHA%5D%7D)
Explanation:
ka is defined as the dissociation constant of an acid. It is defined as the ratio of concentration of products to the concentration of reactants.
For the dissociation of weak acid, the chemical equation follows:
The equilibrium constant is defined by the equilibrium concentration of products over reactants:
Answer:
both are same give different number
Answer:You can reduce our carbon footprints by using renewable energy,
Explanation:
The equilibrium reaction, causes the water dissociation constant, Kw, is 1.01 × 10-14<span> at 25 °C. That is because every H</span>+<span> (H</span>3O+) ion these forms accompanied by the formation of an OH-<span> ion, are the concentrations of these ions and in pure water the same thing can be calculated from </span>Kw<span>.
HOPED THIS HELP OUT ;)
</span>
