All categories

2 years ago

PLZZZZZ HELP

Engineering

2 answers:

Norma-Jean [14]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Paragraph

Explanation:

Comments improve a computer program because while comments can help programmers understand source code and specify programmers' assumptions and intentions in an explicit way, bad or obsolete comments can negatively affect software quality by increasing the chance of misunderstanding among programmers. They can also be used to solve problems right away in case someone is not on online to help people. People can also be aware of dangerous cites and virus that lie in the computer. Lastly comments can help computer programs by in computer programming, a comment is a programmer-readable explanation or annotation in the source code of a computer program. They are added with the purpose of making the source code easier for humans to understand, and are generally ignored by compilers and interpreters.

I hope this helps!

Pani-rosa [81]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Comments on a computer program give feedback to the developer and helps the developer to make the computer program better. The comments would see problems that may have been overlooked by the developer and tell the developer about the problems that need to be fixed. The comments would also give reviews and critique the computer program on things that need to be taken out or things that need to be brought in. For an example, if a computer program has a glitch/bug then the comments could inform the developer of the glitch/bug that needs to fixed.

You might be interested in

A pitfall cited in Section 1.10 is expecting to improve the overall performance of a computer by improving only one aspect of th

Oxana [17]

Answer:

a) For this case the new time to run the FP operation would be reduced 20% so that means 100-20% =80% from the original time

$(1-0.2)*70 s =56s$

The reduction on this case is $70-56 s=14s$

And since the new total time would be given by $250-14=236 s$

b) For this case the total time is reduced 20% so that means that the new total time would be (1-0.2)=0.8 times the original total time $(1-0.2) *250s =200 s$

The original time for INT operations is calculated as:

$250 = 70+85+40 +t_{INT}$

$t_{INT}=55s$

For this part the only time that was changed is assumed the INT operations so then:

$200 = 70+85+40 \Delta t_{INT}$

And then: $\Delta t_{INT}= 200-70-85-40=5 s$

c) A reduction of the total time implies that the total time would be 205 s from the results above. And the time for FP is 70, for L/S is 85 and for INT operations is 55 s, so then if we add 70+85+55=210s, we see that 210>205 so then we cannot reduce the total time 20% just reducing the branch intructions.

Explanation:

From the info given we know that a computer running a program that requires 250 s, with 70 s spent executing FP instructions, 85 s executed L/S instructions and 40 s spent executing branch instructions.

Part 1

For this case the new time to run the FP operation would be reduced 20% so that means 100-20% =80% from the original time

$(1-0.2)*70 s =56s$

The reduction on this case is $70-56 s=14s$

And since the new total time would be given by $250-14=236 s$

Part 2

For this case the total time is reduced 20% so that means that the new total time would be (1-0.2)=0.8 times the original total time $(1-0.2) *250s =200 s$

The original time for INT operations is calculated as:

$250 = 70+85+40 +t_{INT}$

$t_{INT}=55s$

For this part the only time that was changed is assumed the INT operations so then:

$200 = 70+85+40 \Delta t_{INT}$

And then: $\Delta t_{INT}= 200-70-85-40=5 s$

And we can quantify the decrease using the relative change:

$\% Change = \frac{5s}{55 s} *100 = 9.09\%$ of reduction

Part 3

A reduction of the total time implies that the total time would be 205 s from the results above. And the time for FP is 70, for L/S is 85 and for INT operations is 55 s, so then if we add 70+85+55=210s, we see that 210>205 so then we cannot reduce the total time 20% just reducing the branch intructions.

8 0

2 years ago

What is the maximum thermal efficiency possible for a power cycle operating between 600P'c and 110°C? a). 47% b). 56% c). 63% d)

Anastasy [175]

Answer:

(b) 56%

Explanation:

the maximum thermal efficiency is possible only when power cycle is reversible in nature and when power cycle is reversible in nature the thermal efficiency depends on the temperature

here we have given T₁ (Higher temperature)= 600+273=873

lower temperature T₂=110+273=383

Efficiency of power cycle is given by =1- $\frac{T2}{T1}$

=1- $\frac{383}{873}$

=1-0.43871

=.56

=56%

5 0

2 years ago

For a steel alloy it has been determined that a carburizing heat treatment of 11-h duration will raise the carbon concentration

Jobisdone [24]

Answer:

Time =t2=58.4 h

Explanation:

Since temperature is the same hence using condition

x^2/Dt=constant

where t is the time as temperature so D also remains constant

hence

x^2/t=constant

2.3^2/11=5.3^2/t2

time=t^2=58.4 h

4 0

3 years ago

In casting experiments performed using a certain alloy and type of sand mold, it took 170 sec for a cube-shaped casting to solid

poizon [28]

Answer:

Answer for the question is : Solidification time will be same i.e. 170. See attached file for explanation.

Explanation:

Download pdf

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Air expands through a turbine operating at steady state. At the inlet p1 = 150 lbf/in^2, T1 = 1400R and at the exit p2 = 14.8 lb

Paraphin [41]

Answer:

The power developed in HP is 2702.7hp

Explanation:

Given details.

P1 = 150 lbf/in^2,

T1 = 1400°R

P2 = 14.8 lbf/in^2,

T2 = 700°R

Mass flow rate m1 = m2 = m = 11 lb/s Q = -65000 Btu/h

Using air table to obtain the values for h1 and h2 at T1 and T2

h1 at T1 = 1400°R = 342.9 Btu/h

h2 at T2 = 700°R = 167.6 Btu/h

Using;

Q - W + m(h1) - m(h2) = 0

W = Q - m (h2 -h1)

W = (-65000 Btu/h ) - 11 lb/s (167.6 - 342.9) Btu/h

W = (-65000 Btu/h ) - (-1928.3) Btu/s

W = (-65000 Btu/h ) * {1hr/(60*60)s} - (-1928.3) Btu/s

W = -18.06Btu/s + 1928.3 Btu/s

W = 1910.24Btu/s

Note; Btu/s = 1.4148532hp

W = 2702.7hp

5 0

3 years ago