Answer:
the first equation
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The decision rule is
Fail to reject the null hypothesis
The conclusion is
There is no sufficient evidence to show that the designer's claim of a better shoe is supported by the trial results.
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The population mean is 
The sample size is n = 25
The sample mean is 
The standard deviation is 
Let assume the level of significance of this test is 
The null hypothesis is 
The alternative hypothesis is 
Generally the degree of freedom is mathematically represented as

=> 
=> 
Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

=> 
=> 
Generally from the student t distribution table the probability of obtaining
to the right of the curve at a degree of freedom of
is

From the value obtained we see that
hence
The decision rule is
Fail to reject the null hypothesis
The conclusion is
There is no sufficient evidence to show that the designer's claim of a better shoe is supported by the trial results.
hurdler falled down before the 353535 steps of 100100100 race.
we need to find where she fell down
so we need subtract 353535 from 100100100

she falled at 99746565 step before completing the race
If sandys friends ate 0, 2, 3, 4, 6, 6, and 7 pretzels, the mean of the data would be 4. So yes sandy is correct.
Answer: Use the PEMDAS rule
Step-by-step explanation: 0z+3z+5=2(z-3)=
z= -1
you need to do the z numbers all together and the normal numbers together then subtract them to get -1
I hope that I help you