Answer:
False.
Explanation:
Tensile strength should remain constant, regardless of thickness. For larger cross sections, it can slightly increase because the atoms in the center become more constricted and therefore less responsive to the applied stress.
Answer:
(a)F= 3.83 * 10^3 N
(b)Altitude=8.20 * 10^5 m
Explanation:
On the launchpad weight = gravitational force between earth and satellite.
W = GMm/R²
where R is the earth radius.
Re-arranging:
WR² / GM = m
m = 4900 * (6.3 * 10^6)² / (6.67 * 10^-11 * 5.97 * 10^24) = 488 kg
The centripetal force (Fc) needed to keep the satellite moving in a circular orbit of radius (r) is:
Fc = mω²r
where ω is the angular velocity in radians/second. The satellite completes 1 revolution, which is 2π radians, in 1.667 hours.
ω = 2π / (1.667 * 60 * 60) = 1.05 * 10^-3 rad/s
When the satellite is in orbit at a distance (r) from the CENTRE of the earth, Fc is provided by the gravitational force between the earth and the satellite:
Fc = GMm/r²
mω²r = GMm / r²
ω²r = GM / r²
r³ = GM/ω² = (6.67 * 10^-11 * 5.97 * 10^24) / (1.05 * 10^-3)²
r³ = 3.612 * 10^20
r = 7.12 * 10^6 m
(a)
F = GMm/r²
F=(6.67 * 10^-11 * 5.97 * 10^24 * 488) / (7.12 * 10^6 )²
F= 3.83 * 10^3 N
(b) Altitude = r - R = (7.12 * 10^6) - (6.3 * 10^6) = 8.20 * 10^5 m
Answer:
b) 12.12 m/s² upwards
Explanation:
∑F = ma
21 sin 60° N = (1.5 kg) a
a = 12.12 m/s²
Answer:
a. It became deeper by a factor of 3.
Explanation:
What we have is water flowing down a river with constant width. The water slows from speed v to v3 over a shirt distance
Using the equation of continuity
A1V1 = A2V2 ----1
A1 is the area of rectangle
V1 is the velocity of water
Area of rectangle = length x width
We rewrite equation 1 as
λ1w1v1 = λ2w2v2
We have w1 = w2
λ1v1 = λ2v2
λ1*v1 = λ2*v/3
λ1 = λ2/3
So it becomes deeper by a factor of 3
-- You make a prediction.
-- Your prediction is proven incorrect. (Somebody somewhere somehow came up with an experiment that produced an observation that can't be debated, disputed, or denied, and it demonstrated that your prediction doesn't hold water.)
-- Your prediction is wrong. There's no getting around it. You just have to get over it, and give up on that prediction completely. If you try to bend and fold facts in order to hold on to that prediction, you're just fooling yourself.
-- The smart thing to do is to <em>learn</em> from the other guy's research, know that your first prediction is incorrect, and use your new knowledge to refine your prediction ... replacing it with a new, different one.
