Answer: La diferencia es el peso (o la masa), siendo que el cubo de hierro es el mas pesado, después viene el de madera y después el de icopor.
Explanation:
Ok, los 3 cubos tienen el mismo tamaño, lo que implica que tienen el mismo volumen.
Ahora es útil recordar la relación:
Densidad = masa/volumen.
Masa = densidad*volumen.
Nosotros sabemos que la densidad del hierro es mas grande que la de la madera, y la densidad de la madera es mas grande que la del icopor.
Entonces, por la relación anterior, y sabiendo que todos los cubos tienen el mismo volumen, podemos reconocer que el cubo de hierro tiene mayor masa, después viene el de madera y después viene el de icopor.
Y sabiendo que:
masa*gravedad = peso
podemos saber que el cubo mas pesado es el de hierro, después el de madera y después el de icopor.
Además de esta diferencia, también hay otras que no dependen tanto del tamaño del objeto, como pueden ser las capacidades caloríficas, el como reaccionan a campos eléctricos y cosas así que son triviales, pues son diferentes para casi todos los materiales.
Answer:
C = 771.35 J/kg°C
Explanation:
Here, e consider the conservation of energy equation. The conservation of energy principle states that:
Heat Given by Metal Piece = Heat Absorbed by Water + Heat Absorbed by Container
Since,
Heat Given or Absorbed by a material = m C ΔT
Therefore,
m₁CΔT₁ = m₂CΔT₂ + m₃C₃ΔT₃
where,
m₁ = Mass of Metal Piece = 2.3 kg
C = Specific Heat of Metal = ?
ΔT₁ = Change in temperature of metal piece = 165°C - 18°C = 147°C
m₂ = Mass of Metal Container = 3.8 kg
ΔT₂ = Change in temperature of metal piece = 18°C - 15°C = 3°C
m₃ = Mass of Water = 20 kg
C₃ = Specific Heat of Water = 4200 J/kg°C
ΔT₃ = Change in temperature of water = 18°C - 15°C = 3°C
Therefore,
(2.3 kg)(C)(147°C) = (3.8 kg)(C)(3°C) + (20 kg)(4186 J/kg°C)(3°C)
C[(2.3 kg)(147°C) - (3.8 kg)(3°C)] = 252000 J
C = 252000 J/326.7 kg°C
<u>C = 771.35 J/kg°C</u>
1) Refraction
2)Reflection
3)Concave
4)Convex
I took the test and got this right so you can believe me :)
Hope this helps
Answer:
The correct answer is a) The kinetic energy of the ice increases by equal amounts for equal distances.
Explanation:
The law of conservation states that the energy cannot be created nor be destroyed but can be converted from one form to another.Before the ice even starts falling we already know that it possesses energy in the form of potential energy given by P=mgh where m is the mass of the ice , g is the acceleration due to gravity and h is the height of the ice above the ground whatever that may be, since a number is not given here.As the ice falls the energy is converted from potential energy to kinetic energy. We notice one thing about the equation for the potential energy P , which is that it is not only directly proportional to h but also is linear in h as well(which is the main reason why a) is correct) which means that if the ice drops by 1 meter the potential energy it will have lost would be ΔPE=mgΔh=-mg, where Δh is the change in its height which is 1 meter here.And according to the principle of conservation of energy this energy must be converted to kinetic energy so the ΔKE=-ΔPE=mg, and this process repeats and for each meter it falls, it picks up the same amount of kinetic energy equaling mg(which is the same as the loss in PE per each meter of fall). So a 2 meter decrease in height will result in an increase in KE of 2mg, a 3 meter decrease in height will result in an increase in KE of 3mg. gain in kinetic energy only depends on the drop in height, which is true irrespective of where the ice might happen to be in its journey close to the top or the bottom. So the drop in height of lets say x at any point in the journey will result in the same increase in KE = ΔKE = mgx. Which proves part a) to be correct.
