1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
schepotkina [342]
3 years ago
12

9. The times of first sprinkler activation (in seconds) for a series of tests of fire-prevention sprinkler systems that use aque

ous film-forming foam is as follows. The system has been designed so that the true average activation time is supposed to be at most 25 seconds. Does the data indicate the design specifications have not been met
Chemistry
1 answer:
Nezavi [6.7K]3 years ago
3 0

This question is incomplete, the complete question is;

The times of first sprinkler activation (in seconds) for a series of tests of fire-prevention sprinkler systems that use aqueous film-forming foam is as follows; 27 41 22 27 23 35 30 33 24 27 28 22 24

( see " use of AFFF in sprinkler systems," Fire technology, 1975: 5)

The system has been designed so that the true average activation time is supposed to be at most 25 seconds.

Does the data indicate the design specifications have not been met?

Test the relevant hypothesis at significance level 0.05 using the P-value approach  

     

Answer:

since p-value (0.042299) is lesser than the level of significance ( 0.05)

We Reject Null Hypothesis

Hence, There is no sufficient evidence that the true average activation time is at most 25 seconds

Explanation:

Given the data in the question;

lets consider Null and Alternative hypothesis;

Null hypothesis H₀ : There is sufficient evidence that the true average activation time is at most 25 seconds

Alternative hypothesis H₁ : There is no sufficient evidence that the true average activation time is at most 25 seconds

i.e

Null hypothesis H₀ : μ ≤ 25

Alternative hypothesis H₁ :  μ > 25

level of significance σ = 0.05

first we determine the sample mean;

x^{bar} = \frac{1}{n}∑x_{i}

where n is sample size and ∑x_{i} is summation of all the sample;

=  \frac{1}{13}( 27 + 41 + 22 + 27 + 23 + 35 + 30 + 33 + 24 + 27 + 28 + 22 + 24 )

=   \frac{1}{13}( 363

sample mean x^{bar} = 27.9231

next we find the standard deviation

s = √( \frac{1}{n-1}∑(x_{i}-x^{bar})²

x                    (x_{i}-x^{bar})                       (x_{i}-x^{bar})²

27                   -0.9231                          0.8521

41                    13.0769                        171.0053

22                  -5.9231                          35.0831  

27                  -0.9231                          0.8521

23                  -4.9231                          24.2369

35                  7.0769                          50.0825

30                  2.0769                          4.3135

33                  5.0769                          25.7749

24                  -3.9231                          15.3907

27                  -0.9231                          0.8521

28                  0.0769                          0.0059

22                 -5.9231                          35.0831  

24                 -3.9231                          15.3907

sum                                                    378.9229

so ∑(x_{i}-x^{bar})² = 378.9229

∴

s = √( \frac{1}{13-1} ×378.9229 )

s = √31.5769

standard deviation s = 5.6193

now, the Test statistics

t = ( x^{bar} - μ ) / \frac{s}{\sqrt{n} }

we substitute

t = ( 27.9231 - 25 ) / \frac{5.6193}{\sqrt{13} }

t = 2.9231 / 1.5585

t = 1.88

now degree of freedom df = n - 1 = 13 - 1 = 12

next we calculate p-value

p-value = 0.042299 ( using Execl's ( = TDIST(1.88,12,1)))

Here x=1.88, df=12, one tail

now we compare the p-value with the level of significance

since p-value (0.042299) is lesser than the level of significance ( 0.05)

We Reject Null Hypothesis

Hence, There is no sufficient evidence that the true average activation time is at most 25 seconds

You might be interested in
1. How many moles of LiBr are present in 100 mL of 1.25M LIBr solution?
Svet_ta [14]

Answer:

https://www.webassign.net/question_assets/wertzcams3/appendix.pdf

7 0
3 years ago
if 2.0 g of hydrogen sulfide, H2S(g) reacts with 5.0 g of sodium hydroxide what mass of the excess reactant is present when the
Ronch [10]

Answer: iits 9.g

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Explain how scientific observations led to the development of, and changes to, the periodic table.
Musya8 [376]
The following are scientific observations which led to development and changes of periodic table: Dmitri Mendeleev is the first periodic table organized 63 known element according to its properties, organized into rows and columns and inscribed name, mass and chemical properties on each element. Julius Lothar Meyer who independently worked in Germany with Ernest Rutherford. They experimented with 38 metals and found out that the positive charge of each element nucleus increased by one from element to element and organized the periodic table that tip to modern explanation of atomic number and the recognition of atomic number was the basis for organization of periodic table.
7 0
3 years ago
Will mark the brainiest later for correct answers! Please show work.
Elodia [21]

Answer:

According to avogadro's law, 1 mole of every substance contains avogadro's number 6.023\times 10^{23} of particles and weighs equal to its molecular mass.

To calculate the moles, we use the equation:

\text{Number of moles}=\frac{\text{Given mass}}{\text {Molar mass}}

\text{Number of moles}=\frac{\text{Given molecules}}{\text {Avogadros number}}

a. moles in 14.08 g of C_{12}H_{22}O_{11} = \frac{14.08g}{342.3g/mol}=0.04113moles

molecules in 14.08 g of C_{12}H_{22}O_{11} = 0.04113\times 6.023\times 10^{23}=0.2477\times 10^{23}

b. moles in 17.75 g of NaCl = \frac{17.75g}{58.5g/mol}=0.3034moles

molecules in 17.75 g of NaCl = 0.3034\times 6.023\times 10^{23}=1.827\times 10^{23}

formula units 17.75 g of NaCl = 0.3034\times 6.023\times 10^{23}=1.827\times 10^{23}

c. moles in 20.06 g of  CuSO_4.5H_2O= \frac{20.06g}{249.68g/mol}=0.08034moles

formula units in 20.06 g of  CuSO_4.5H_2O= 0.08034\times 6.023\times 10^{23}=0.4839\times 10^{23}

7 0
3 years ago
A piece of metal has a volume of 30.0cm3 and a mass of 252g. What is its density? what metal do you think this is?
Alborosie

Answer:

Explanation:

  1. get density = D = m / V = 0.252 / 0.00003 = 8400
  2. metal will be Cu => bronze
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Suppose you have a crystal composed of elements X and Y in which the radius ratio is approximately ½, so that the sodium chlorid
    11·1 answer
  • Solid lithium metal and diatomic nitrogen gas react spontaneously to form a solid product. Give the balanced chemical equation (
    9·1 answer
  • Acid formulas can be distinguished from base formulas because acid formulas usually and base formulas .
    9·1 answer
  • How is a chemical reaction different from a physical reaction
    8·1 answer
  • 1. Air boiled out of water as steam is rich in ?
    7·1 answer
  • 2. The cheetah is considered one of the fastest land
    12·1 answer
  • Consider the chart describing the element. According to the chart, the element is _______ with an atomic number of ___________.
    13·1 answer
  • If Earth is in between the sun and the Moon in both Image 1 and Image 2, why do you think a lunar eclipse is only happening in I
    14·1 answer
  • Were there any finches that could access more than one food source? If so, which ones?
    14·1 answer
  • When an atom forms negaitive ion?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!