Answer:
1.87x10⁻³ M SO₄²⁻
Explanation:
The reaction of SO₄²⁻ with Ba²⁺ (From Ba(NO₃)₂) is:
SO₄²⁻(aq) + Ba²⁺(aq) → BaSO₄(s)
<em>Where 1 mole of SO₄²⁻ reacts per mole of Ba²⁺</em>
<em />
To reach the end point in this titration, we need to add the same moles of Ba²⁺ that the moles that are of SO₄²⁻.
Thus, to find molarity of SO₄²⁻ we need to find first the moles of Ba²⁺ added (That will be the same of SO₄²⁻). And as the volume of the initial sample was 100mL we can find molarity (As ratio of moles of SO₄²⁻ per liter of solution).
<em>Moles Ba²⁺:</em>
7.48mL = 7.48x10⁻³L ₓ (0.0250moles / L) = 1.87x10⁻⁴ moles of Ba²⁺ = Moles of SO₄²⁻
<em>Molarity SO₄²⁻:</em>
As there are 1.87x10⁻⁴ moles of SO₄²⁻ in 100mL = 0.1L, molarity is:
1.87x10⁻⁴ moles of SO₄²⁻ / 0.1L =
<h3> 1.87x10⁻³ M SO₄²⁻</h3>
Hey there!:
Molar mass N₂ = 28.0134 g/mol
28.0134 g ------------------- 22.4 L (at STP )
mass N₂ -------------------- 50.0 L
mass N₂ = 50.0 x 28.0134 / 22.4
mass N₂ = 1400.67 / 22.4
mass N₂ = 62.529 g
Hope this helps!
Answer:
both
Explanation:
id say that it could occur but also not as much. the moon would be smaller and further from the earth to where we would barely be able to see it. if the full moon is barely visible then im sure the total solar eclipse wouldn't be as noticeable as it is now. but thats just my opinion
10.92N
Force = mass x acceleration
4.2kg x 1.6m/s^2 = 10.92N
