1. 0.2 g/mL
The relationship between mass, density and volume of an object is
where
d is the density
m is the mass
V is the volume
For the object in this problem, we have
m = 10 g
V = 50 mL
Substituting into the equation,
2. 10 mL
In this exercise we know:
- The density of the object: d = 2 g/mL
- The mass of the object: m = 20 g
Therefore, we can re-arrange the previous equation to find the volume:
And substituting values into the equation, we find
Electron configurations:
Ge: [Ar] 3d10 4s2 4p2 => 6 electrons in the outer shell
Br: [Ar] 3d10 4s2 4p5 => 7 electrons in the outer shell
Kr: [Ar] 3d10 4s2 4p6 => 8 electrons in the outer shell
The electron affinity or propension to attract electrons is given by the electronic configuration. Remember that the most stable configuration is that were the last shell is full, i.e. it has 8 electrons.
The closer an atom is to reach the 8 electrons in the outer shell the bigger the electron affinity.
Of the three elements, Br needs only 1 electron to have 8 electrons in the outer shell, so it has the biggest electron affinity (the least negative).
Ge: needs 2 electrons to have 8 electrons in the outer shell, so it has a smaller (more negative) electron affinity than Br.
Kr, which is a noble gas, has 8 electrons and is not willing to attract more electrons at all, the it has the lowest (more negative) electron affinity of all three to the extension that really the ion is so unstable that it does not make sense to talk about a number for the electron affinity of this atom.
Answer A
Explanation: because u need to make sure you know the difference between a need and a want
There could as smaller objects have more inertia. Mass is a measure of an objects in Harsha. Objects with greater mass have a greater in Inertia yet it’s still maintains the same amount of inertia as usual. It still has the same tendency to resist changes in its state of motion. So yes it is possible that there could ever be a situation where a small sports car would have more inertia than a big bus. :)
Answer:
Explanation:
from the question we are told that
Load
Force
Angle of inclination
Displacement
coefficient of kinetic friction