All categories

2 years ago

How high above the ground would a 2 kg object need to be in order to have 180 J

Physics

1 answer:

ankoles [38]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

energy= MGH

2*9.8*h=180

h=180/19.6

h=9.32 m

You might be interested in

A 900 kilogram compact car was stopped at a traffic light when an 1800 kilogram luxury sedan struck it from behind the two cars

SOVA2 [1]

The answer is B. 22.7 kg-m/s

7 0

3 years ago

What factor causes atmospheric pressure

bagirrra123 [75]

Atmospheric pressure is caused by the weight of the atmosphere pushing down on itself and on the surface below it.
Pressure is defined as the force acting on an object divided by the area upon witch the force is acting.

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why are potassium molecules likely to enter a red blood cell?

noname [10]

<span>they have to be selective permeable to filter out the waste products but allow the nutrients and blood cells to pass through. </span>

5 0

2 years ago

A thin soap bubble of index of refraction 1.33 is viewed with light of wavelength 550.0nm and appears very bright. Predict a pos

faust18 [17]

Answer:

The possible thickness of the soap bubble = $1.034\times 10^{-7}\ m.$

Explanation:

<u>Given:</u>

Refractive index of the soap bubble, $\mu=1.33.$
Wavelength of the light taken, $\lambda = 550.0\ nm = 550.0\times 10^{-9}\ m.$

Let the thickness of the soap bubble be $t$ .

It is given that the soap bubble appears very bright, it means, there is a constructive interference takes place.

For the constructive interference of light through a thin film ( soap bubble), the condition of constructive interference is given as:

$2\mu t=\left ( m+\dfrac 12 \right )\lambda.$

where $m$ is the order of constructive interference.

Since the soap bubble is appearing very bright, the order should be 0, as $0^{th}$ order interference has maximum intensity.

Thus,

$2\mu t=\left (0+\dfrac 12\right )\lambda\\t=\dfrac{\lambda}{4\mu}\\\ \ = \dfrac{550\times 10^{-9}}{4\times 1.33}\\\ \ = 1.034\times 10^{-7}\ m.$

It is the possible thickness of the soap bubble.

6 0

2 years ago

Describe a situation where you could properly conclude that a set of data is precise but

Orlov [11]

It’s not arrested because if you look closer it’s plug walk I don’t even understand how it talk tho

4 0

2 years ago