Answer:
Jordan used her eyes to see the food, her touch to feel the food, and her nose to smell the food, and lastly, but most importantly, she used her mouth to taste the food.
Answer:
8861.75 m approximately 8862 m
Explanation:
We need to remember Newton's 2nd Law which says that the force experienced by an object is proportional to his acceleration and that the constant of proportionality between those two vectors correspond to the mass of the object.
for the weight of an object (which is a force) we have that the acceleration experienced by that object is equal to the gravitational acceleration, obtaining that
For simplicity we work with despiting the effect of the height above sea level. In this problem, we've been asked by the height above sea level that makes the weight of an object 0.30% more lighter.
In accord with the formula the "normal" or "standard" weight of an object is given by when , so we need to find the value of that makes meaning that the original weight decrease by a 0.30%, so now we operate...
now we group like terms on the same sides we cancel equal tems on both sides and obtain that
Answer:
b) The null hypothesis should be rejected.
Explanation:
The null hypothesis is that the mean shear strength of spot welds is at least
3.1 MPa
H0: u ≥3.1 MPa against the claim Ha: u< 3.1 MPa
The alternate hypothesis is that the mean shear strength of spot welds is less than 3.1 MPa.
This is one tailed test
The critical region Z(0.05) < ± 1.645
The Sample mean= x`= 3.07
The number of welds= n= 15
Standard Deviation= s= 0.069
Applying z test
z= x`-u/s/√n
z= 3.07-3.1/0.069/√15
z= -0.03/0.0178
z= -1.68
As the calculated z= -1.68 falls in the critical region Z(0.05) < ± 1.645 the null hypothesis is rejected and the alternate hypothesis is accepted that the mean shear strength of spot welds is less than 3.1 MPa
Answer:
The question is explained in detailed way in explanation section and in attached files.
Explanation:
The HIPAA Security Rule is designed to be flexible and appropriate for our organization’s particular size, structure, and inherent risks to business and personal information. Risk analysis is meant to be an ongoing process, during which we regularly review our records to track access to business and personal systems and data. With this in mind, I recommend that we expand our information security strategy to include more than just what is required in HIPAA. Just as a reminder below is the HIPAA ecompliance and implementation strategy that we came up with last week as given in attached file 1.
There are several areas in IT security that the above is incomplete or insufficient in. We recommend implementing several more complete or alternative controls in order to protect our systems, patients, employees, contractors, vendors, and assets beyond the HIPAA minimum requirements. The below section describes what the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) recommend as additional areas to focus on in the effort to increase an organization's security. (See the attached file # example of some of the areas that we should monitor beyond what HIPAA requires are given in attached file # 03.