Pseudo-science is not considered real science because it is not testable.
Answer: Option A
<u>Explanation:</u>
Pseudoscience primarily includes beliefs, theories or practices that are somehow incompatible with the scientific facts. The pseudoscience can’t be tested on the basis of science.
Let’s take an example of astrology. Some people believe that stars and other celestial bodies draw a significant impact on their life i.e. Good or bad thing it's just because their stars are working either in a positive or negative manner.
But, this belief doesn’t have any well-proved or authentic background over which the whole concept can rely on. Hence, pseudoscience is not taken as a real science as a lack of strong proves.
<span>graduated cylinder is the answer</span>
They have different number of Neutrons and protons, so their masses are different
Hope this helps!
Answer:
- 13.56 g of sodium chloride are theoretically yielded.
- Limiting reactant is copper (II) chloride and excess reactant is sodium nitrate.
- 0.50 g of sodium nitrate remain when the reaction stops.
- 92.9 % is the percent yield.
Explanation:
Hello!
In this case, according to the question, it is possible to set up the following chemical reaction:

Thus, we can first identify the limiting reactant by computing the yielded mass of sodium chloride, NaCl, by each reactant via stoichiometry:

Thus, we infer that copper (II) chloride is the limiting reactant as it yields the fewest grams of sodium chloride product. Moreover the formed grams of this product are 13.56 g. Then, we take 13.56 g of sodium chloride to compute the consumed mass sodium nitrate as it is in excess:

Therefore, the leftover of sodium nitrate is:

Finally, the percent yield is computed via:

Best regards!