Pour the entire components into water.
First the iron filings can be separated using a magnet as iron is a magnetic element.
By pouring the mixture into water, it allows the salt to dissolve in the water, while the sand will not.
Next we can run this solution through a filtration device to separate the sand from the water.
Now all that's left is to let the water evaporate so that the salt will be exposed that dissolved into the water.
Explanation:
1-How many moles of NazCOs are in 10.0 ml of a 2.0 M solution?
2-How many moles of NaCl are contained in 100.0 ml of a 0.20 M solution?
3- What weight (in grams) of H2SO4 would be needed to make 750.0 ml of
2.00 M solution?
4-What volume (in ml) of 18.0 M H2SO4 is needed to contain 2.45 g H2S04?
Answer:
Electric potential energy at the negative terminal: 
Explanation:
When a particle with charge
travels across a potential difference
, then its change in electric potential energy is

In this problem, we know that:
The particle is an electron, so its charge is

We also know that the positive terminal is at potential

While the negative terminal is at potential

Therefore, the potential difference (final minus initial) is

So, the change in potential energy of the electron is

This means that the electron when it is at the negative terminal has
of energy more than when it is at the positive terminal.
Since the potential at the positive terminal is 0, this means that the electric potential energy of the electron at the negative end is

Answer:
false statement : b ) For the motion of a cart on an incline plane having a coefficient of kinetic friction of 0.5, the magnitude of the change in kinetic energy equals the magnitude of the change in gravitational potential energy
Explanation:
mechanical energy = potential energy + kinetic energy = constant
differentiating both side
Δ potential energy + Δ kinetic energy = 0
Δ potential energy = - Δ kinetic energy
first statement is true.
Friction is a non conservative force so inter-conversion of potential and kinetic energy is not possible in that case. In case of second option, the correct relation is as follows
change in gravitational potential energy = change in kinetic energy + work done against friction .
So given 2 nd option is incorrect.
In case of no change in gravitational energy , work done is equal to
change in kinetic energy.
There would be very less percentage loss<span> of the kinetic energy during </span>the conversion<span> to internal energy, assuming that there is less air in the </span>surroundings<span>. Also, the friction will contribute to the conversion where if it is, the percentage loses is negligible.</span>