The big advantage to using continuous compounding to express growth rates is it avoids the problem of asymmetry in growth rates:
For example, if we use the normal definition and $100 grows to $105 in one time period, that's a growth rate of $105/$100 - 1 = 5% But if $105 decreases to $100, that's a growth rate of $100/$105 - 1 = -4.76%
The problem of asymmetry is those two growth rates, 5% and -4.75% are not equal up to a sign.
But if you use continuous compounding the growth rate in the first case is ln(105/100) = 0.04879.
And the growth rate in the second is ln (100/105) = -0.04879.
Those two growth rates are definitely the negative of each other.<span>
</span>
Answer:
It’s C I think Explanation:
Mass of each silver coin = 5.67 g
Molar mass of silver = 107.87 g/mol
Calculating the moles of silver from given mass and molar mass of silver:

Calculating the atoms of silver in 0.05260 mol using the conversion factor,
:

Therefore,
atoms of silver are present in each coin.
I have no idea I’m sorry I’m doing a test and need to put a question
<u>Answer:</u> The predicted cell potential of the cell is +0.0587 V
<u>Explanation:</u>
The half reactions for the cell is:
<u>Oxidation half reaction (anode):</u> 
<u>Reduction half reaction (cathode):</u> 
In this case, the cathode and anode both are same. So,
will be equal to zero.
To calculate cell potential of the cell, we use the equation given by Nernst, which is:
![E_{cell}=E^o_{cell}-\frac{0.0592}{n}\log \frac{[M^{2+}_{(diluted)}]}{[M^{2+}_{(concentrated)}]}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=E_%7Bcell%7D%3DE%5Eo_%7Bcell%7D-%5Cfrac%7B0.0592%7D%7Bn%7D%5Clog%20%5Cfrac%7B%5BM%5E%7B2%2B%7D_%7B%28diluted%29%7D%5D%7D%7B%5BM%5E%7B2%2B%7D_%7B%28concentrated%29%7D%5D%7D)
where,
n = number of electrons in oxidation-reduction reaction = 2
= ?
= 0.05 M
= 4.808 M
Putting values in above equation, we get:


Hence, the predicted cell potential of the cell is +0.0587 V