According to the condensation theory, the most important factor for the formation of our planets was "the interstellar dust attracting heat away from the protosun".
Condensation is the procedure by which water particles noticeable all around bunch together and shape fluid water. This is regularly observed outwardly of cold glasses. This idea additionally identifies with the solar system.
The condensation theory of the solar system expresses that our solar system, and perhaps all other galaxies, were shaped from a cloud of residue and gas that consolidated into strong issue. Space experts trust that the littlest grains of residue in our cloud applied a draw on the gas about it, 'consolidating' into bigger and bigger bits of issue, similarly as a snowball moving downhill will become bigger and bigger. In the long run, the gravitational draw of these residue atoms was sufficiently solid that they started to pull in each other, developing into greater and greater clusters that had more grounded gravitational pulls. In the long run, these bunches of residue and gas from the cloud frame a star, and potentially planets, space rocks, and comets turning about the star.
If your speed changes from 10 km/h to 6 km/h then
you have an acceleration.
Whether it's a positive or negative one completely depends
on which direction you decided to call the positive direction,
when you started considering your speed and its changes.
If you decided to call the direction in which you're traveling
the positive direction, then a decrease in your speed is a
negative acceleration.
But you could just as easily have said that you're traveling
in the negative direction. If you did that, then a decrease in
your speed would be a positive acceleration.
It's completely up to you, and how you define things.
Well, im pretty sure that when we do touch eachother, the atoms themselves are touching. idk if this is what ur looking for but hope this helps.
Answer:
it's ii) R is correct while A is incorrect
Explanation:
cuz, both statements are correct but the reason is not the correct reason for the assertion,
