1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tino4ka555 [31]
2 years ago
12

Please help only if you know, it is not the first answer choice! Thank you! Correct= Brainliest

Chemistry
2 answers:
Softa [21]2 years ago
6 0
C.

If a power line were broken then power would not reach the light. Which is possible.

If a wire to the light or to the box in your house was broken your light would not receive power, therefore not turn on. Again possible.

If the power plant does not produce enough electricity, although unlikely, that would cause you to not be able to turn on your light. Unlikely but it would be true is it happened.


Finally C is not likely, your wires in your house are most likely made of copper but too many conductors in the wire, not only wouldn’t happen, but would most likely not interrupt your light working.

The question asks what is NOT a possible cause. C is the only not possible.
Reil [10]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

c

Explanation:

the wires are made of too many conductors

You might be interested in
N2+3H2 → 2NH3
s2008m [1.1K]

Explanation:

N2 (g) + H2 (g) gives out NH3 (g)

Now balance it. You have two reactants with compositions involving a single element, which makes it very easy to keep track of how much is on each side. I would balance the nitrogens, and then the hydrogens.

Now balance it. You have two reactants with compositions involving a single element, which makes it very easy to keep track of how much is on each side. I would balance the nitrogens, and then the hydrogens.(If you balance the hydrogen reactant with a whole number first, I can guarantee you that you will have to give NH3 a new stoichiometric coefficient.)

N2 (g) + 3H2 (g) gives out 2NH3 (g)

The stoichiometric coefficients tell you that if we can somehow treat every component in the reaction as the same (like on a per-mol basis, hinthint), then one "[molar] equivalent" of nitrogen yields two [molar] equivalents of ammonia.

Luckily, one mol of anything is equal in quantity to one mol of anything else because the comparison is made in the units of mols.

So what do we do? Convert to

mols (remember the hint?).

28g N2 × 1 mol N2/ 2 × 14.007) g N2

= 0.9995 mol N2

At this point you don't even need to calculate the number of mols of H2 . Why? Because H2 is about 2 g/mol, which means we have over 10 mols of H2. We have 1 mol N2, and we need three times as many mols of H2 as we have

N2.

After doing the actual calculation you should realize that we have about 4 times as much H2 as we need. Therefore the limiting reagent is clearly N2.

Thus, we should yield 2×0.9995=1.9990 mols of NH3 (refer back to the reaction). So this is the second and last calculation we need to do:

1.9990 mol NH3 × 17.0307 g NH3/ 1 mol NH3

= 34.0444 g NH3

Hope it helpz~

4 0
2 years ago
How can toxicant absorption be reduced after exposure to the skin? How can absorption be reduced for orally consumed chemicals?
zmey [24]

Answer:

The toxicant absorbtion can be reduced after exposure to the skin the surrounding clothing shoes or gloves should be removed or torn off than the part of the body which was exposured to the toxicant should be immediatly washed using clean running water for a while, with cold shower being the most recommended splashing method. In case of absorption for orally consumed chemicals should check on any remaining toxicant residue and be removed from the mouth. Vomiting should be induced to patients that are still conscious by providing them with liquids that can provoke vomiting. This will help in removing the toxicant in the intestinal and reduce their effect. Gastric lavage should then be done to induce diarrhea.  

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
There are ________ unpaired electrons in the Lewis symbol for a nitride ion.
Anna71 [15]

Answer:

There are no unpaired electrons.

Explanation:

There are  no unpaired electrons in the Lewis symbol for a nitride ion({ N }^{ 3- }).The nitride ion has a charge of -3. The negative charge on the Nitride ion indicates a gain in electrons . Nitrogen has 5 valence electrons that is the number of electrons that are in its outer shell .The total number of electrons that the nitride ion has is equal to 5+3 = 8 electrons . Electrons usually appear in pairs and obey the octet rule therefore the nitride ion has four electron pairs no unpaired electrons.

5 0
3 years ago
The diagram shows a model of the nitrogen cycle. which role do plants play in the nitrogen cycle?
kenny6666 [7]

Answer

D

Explanation:

They take up usable forms of nitrogen found in soil

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the function of a hypothesis in the scientific inquiry process?
LuckyWell [14K]
It's a question that scientists can test.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Asuming all orbitals are in the same energy level which type of orbital has the lowest energy?
    13·1 answer
  • A valid lewis structure of ________ cannot be drawn without violating the octet rule. select one:
    13·1 answer
  • Why does graphite and diamond sublime?
    12·1 answer
  • How many grams of sucrose are in 1.80 of a 0.718 sucrose solution
    8·1 answer
  • George operates a fishery. Last month, he noticed that the number of fish had decreased. Which discipline can provide valuable i
    14·2 answers
  • What was the most likely problem with the first set of
    15·1 answer
  • Which best categorizes the different types of air.
    14·2 answers
  • Is anyone good at chemistry if so Can someone help me please NO LINKS
    6·1 answer
  • Determine the empirical and molecular formula for a compound containing 26.1
    6·1 answer
  • A transfer of energy can result in objects changing direction. True or False
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!