Ask question

Ask question

All categories

Svetradugi [14.3K]

2 years ago

6

triumphant college is planning to increase the registration fee by 11.5%.if the registration fee is currently N$ 1000, how much

will it be next year?

1 answer:

frozen [14]2 years ago

5 0

Current registration fee at triumphant college = N$ 1000

Percentage by which the registration fee will be increased next year = 11.5%

Registration fee at triumphant college next year :

= Current registration fee + 11.5% of current registration fee

$=\tt1000 + \frac{115}{10 \times 100} \: \: of \: \: 1000$

$= \tt1000 + \frac{115}{1000} \times 1000$

$=\tt 1000 + \frac{115000}{1000}$

$=\tt 1000 + 115$

$\color{plum} = \tt \:\bold{ N\$ \: 1115}$

Therefore, the registration fee at triumphant college next year = <u>N$ 1115</u>

You might be interested in

Help y’all!! it’s gradpoint!! this is the last question & i’ve failed this test so many times :(

scoray [572]

Answer:

just study study study

Step-by-step explanation:

you will learned

5 0

2 years ago

We can find the length of DE using the Pythagorean Theorem:

prohojiy [21]

What's the difference between A) and C)??
There should be an E) because the correct answer would be in either of these forms:
${DE}^{2} = {(4 - 1)}^{2} + {(1 - 3)}^{2} \: \: or \\ DE = \sqrt{( {3}^{2} + {2}^{2} )} \: \: or \\ {DE}^{2} = {(4 - 1)}^{2} + {(3 - 1)}^{2}$

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The population of algae in an experiment has been increasing by 5% each day. If there were 5p algae at the beginning of the expe

Ostrovityanka [42]

Answer:

Number of algae in 7 days = 70.355

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

Algae in beginning = 50

Rate of increasing = 5% per day = 0.05

Number of days = 7 days

Find:

Number of algae in 7 days.

Computation:

$Number\ of\ algae\ in\ 7\ days = Algae\ in\ beginning(1+Rate\ of\ increasing)^{Number\ of\ days}\\\\Number\ of\ algae\ in\ 7\ days = 50(1+0.05)^7\\\\Number\ of\ algae\ in\ 7\ days = 70.355$

Number of algae in 7 days = 70.355

4 0

3 years ago

A counselor at a community college claims that the mean GPA for students who have transferred to State University is more than 3

Lena [83]

Answer:

$t=\frac{3.25-3.1}{\frac{0.3}{\sqrt{36}}}=3$

If we compare the p value and the significance level for example $\alpha=1-0.99=0.01$ we see that $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

And the best conclusion would be:

a) Yes. The counselor's claim is valid

Because we reject the null hypothesis in favor to the alternative hypothesis.

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation

$\bar X=3.25$ represent the sample mean

$s=0.3$ represent the sample standard deviation

$n=36$ sample size

$\mu_o =3.1$ represent the value that we want to test

$\alpha$ represent the significance level for the hypothesis test.

t would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the p value for the test (variable of interest)

State the null and alternative hypotheses.

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if the mean is more than 3.1, the system of hypothesis would be:

Null hypothesis: $\mu \leq 3.1$

Alternative hypothesis: $\mu > 3.1$

If we analyze the size for the sample is < 30 and we don't know the population deviation so is better apply a t test to compare the actual mean to the reference value, and the statistic is given by:

$t=\frac{\bar X-\mu_o}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}}$ (1)

t-test: "Is used to compare group means. Is one of the most common tests and is used to determine if the mean is (higher, less or not equal) to an specified value".

Calculate the statistic

We can replace in formula (1) the info given like this:

$t=\frac{3.25-3.1}{\frac{0.3}{\sqrt{36}}}=3$

P-value

The first step is calculate the degrees of freedom, on this case:

$df=n-1=36-1=35$

Since is a one right tailed test the p value would be:

$p_v =P(t_{(35)}>3)=0.00247$

Conclusion

If we compare the p value and the significance level for example $\alpha=1-0.99=0.01$ we see that $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

And the best conclusion would be:

a) Yes. The counselor's claim is valid

Because we reject the null hypothesis in favor to the alternative hypothesis.

5 0

3 years ago

Solve the system. -3x-y=10; y-4z=-13; x-4y+z=4

kvasek [131]

9514 1404 393

Answer:

(x, y, z) = (-3, -1, 3)

Step-by-step explanation:

Many graphing calculators can solve matrix equations handily. Here, we use a combination of methods.

Use the last equation to write an expression for z.

z = 4 -x +4y

Substitute this into the second equation:

y -4(4 -x +4y) = -13

y -16 +4x -16y = -13

4x -15y -3 = 0

In genera form, the first equation can be written as ...

3x +y +10 = 0

Now, the solution to these two equations can be found to be ...

x = (-15(10) -1(-3))/(4(1) -3(-15)) = (-150 +3)/(4+45) = -3 . . . using "Cramer's rule"

y = -(10 +3x) = -(10 -9) = -1 . . . . from the first equation

z = 4 -(-3) +4(-1) = 3 . . . . . . . . from our equation for z

The solution to the system is (x, y, z) = (-3, -1, 3).

_____

<em>Additional comment</em>

Written as an augmented matrix, the system of equations is ...

$\left[\begin{array}{ccc|c}-3&-1&0&10\\0&1&-4&-13\\1&-4&1&4\end{array}\right]$

4 0

2 years ago