Answer:
Most hydraulic systems develops pressure surges that may surpass settings valve. by exposing the hose surge to pressure above the maximum operating pressure will shorten the hose life.
Explanation:
Solution
Almost all hydraulic systems creates pressure surges that may exceed relief valve settings. exposing the hose surge to pressure above the maximum operating pressure shortens the hose life.
In systems where pressure peaks are severe, select or pick a hose with higher maximum operating pressure or choose a spiral reinforced hose specifically designed for severe pulsing applications.
Generally, hoses are designed or created to accommodate pressure surges and have operating pressures that is equal to 25% of the hose minimum pressure burst.
The number of tubs that each of them sold is; 24 tubs each
The number of days it will take for both of them to sell same amount of tubs is; 4 days
Number of cookies that Nicole had already sold = 4 tubs
Number of cookies sold by Josie before counting = 0 cookies
Nicole now sells 5 tubs per day and
Josie now sells 6 tubs per day.
Let the number of days it will take for them to have sold the same amount of cookies be d.
Thus;
5d + 4 = 6d + 0
6d - 5d = 4
d = 4 days
Thus, total number of cookies for both are;
Total for Nicole = 4 + 5(4) = 24 cookies
Total for Josie = 6(4) = 24 cookies
Read more about proportion at; brainly.com/question/870035
Answer: P = I2R = 0.032 x 1000 =0.9 W
Explanation: The power will be the product of the square of the current and
the resistance of the load. The fact that the circuit is a parallel circuit is irrelevant to this question.
Answer:
Artefacts can influence our actions in several ways. They can be instruments, enabling and facilitating actions, where their presence affects the number and quality of the options for action available to us. They can also influence our actions in a morally more salient way, where their presence changes the likelihood that we will actually perform certain actions. Both kinds of influences are closely related, yet accounts of how they work have been developed largely independently, within different conceptual frameworks and for different purposes. In this paper I account for both kinds of influences within a single framework. Specifically, I develop a descriptive account of how the presence of artefacts affects what we actually do, which is based on a framework commonly used for normative investigations into how the presence of artefacts affects what we can do. This account describes the influence of artefacts on what we actually do in terms of the way facts about those artefacts alter our reasons for action. In developing this account, I will build on Dancy’s (2000a) account of practical reasoning. I will compare my account with two alternatives, those of Latour and Verbeek, and show how my account suggests a specification of their respective key concepts of prescription and invitation. Furthermore, I argue that my account helps us in analysing why the presence of artefacts sometimes fails to influence our actions, contrary to designer expectations or intentions.
When it comes to affecting human actions, it seems artefacts can play two roles. In their first role they can enable or facilitate human actions. Here, the presence of artefacts changes the number and quality of the options for action available to us.Footnote1 For example, their presence makes it possible for us to do things that we would not otherwise be able to do, and thereby adopt new goals, or helps us to do things we would otherwise be able to do, but in more time, with greater effort, etc
Explanation:
Technological artifacts are in general characterized narrowly as material objects made by (human) agents as means to achieve practical ends. ... Unintended by-products of making (e.g. sawdust) or of experiments (e.g. false positives in medical diagnostic tests) are not artifacts for Hilpinen.