1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alexxandr [17]
3 years ago
5

An object with a mass of 15kg is accelerating at 10m/s2. What is the force carried by this object

Chemistry
1 answer:
sladkih [1.3K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: 150N

Explanation:

The formula to calculate the force will be the mass multiplied by the acceleration. In this case, mass = 15kg and acceleration = 10m/s². Therefore, force will be:

= Mass × Acceleration

= 15 × 10

= 150N

The force is 150Newton

You might be interested in
a compound with a molar mass of about 42g/mol contains 85.7% carbon and 14.3% hydrogen by mass. Write the Lewis structure for a
Svetlanka [38]

Answer:

isjsjajsk iwoososo zozoo

4 0
3 years ago
One liter of oxygen gas at standard temperature and pressure has a mass of 1.43 g. The same volume of hydrogen gas under these c
Alchen [17]

Answer:

Indeed, the two samples should contain about the same number of gas particles. However, the molar mass of \rm O_2\; (g) is larger than that of \rm H_2\; (g) (by a factor of about 16.) Therefore, the mass of the \rm O_2\; (g) sample is significantly larger than that of the \rm H_2\; (g) sample.

Explanation:

The \rm O_2\; (g) and the \rm H_2\; (g) sample here are under the same pressure and temperature, and have the same volume. Indeed, if both gases are ideal, then by Avogadro's Law, the two samples would contain the same number of gas particles (\rm O_2\; (g) and \rm H_2\; (g) molecules, respectively.) That is:

n(\mathrm{O_2}) = n(\mathrm{H}_2).

Note that the mass of a gas m is different from the number of gas particles n in it. In particular, if all particles in this gas have a molar mass of M, then:

m = n \cdot M.

In other words,

  • m(\mathrm{O_2}) = n(\mathrm{O_2}) \cdot M(\mathrm{O_2}).
  • m(\mathrm{H_2}) = n(\mathrm{H_2}) \cdot M(\mathrm{H_2}).

The ratio between the mass of the \rm O_2\; (g) and that of the \rm H_2\; (g) sample would be:

\begin{aligned}& \frac{m(\mathrm{O_2})}{m(\mathrm{H_2})} = \frac{n(\mathrm{O_2})\cdot M(\mathrm{O_2})}{n(\mathrm{H_2})\cdot M(\mathrm{H_2})}\end{aligned}.

Since n(\mathrm{O_2}) = n(\mathrm{H}_2) by Avogadro's Law:

\begin{aligned}& \frac{m(\mathrm{O_2})}{m(\mathrm{H_2})} = \frac{n(\mathrm{O_2})\cdot M(\mathrm{O_2})}{n(\mathrm{H_2})\cdot M(\mathrm{H_2})} = \frac{M(\mathrm{O_2})}{M(\mathrm{H_2})}\end{aligned}.

Look up relative atomic mass data on a modern periodic table:

  • \rm O: 15.999.
  • \rm H: 1.008.

Therefore:

  • M(\mathrm{O_2}) = 2 \times 15.999 \approx 31.998\; \rm g \cdot mol^{-1}.
  • M(\mathrm{H_2}) = 2 \times 1.008 \approx 2.016\; \rm g \cdot mol^{-1}.

Verify whether \begin{aligned}& \frac{m(\mathrm{O_2})}{m(\mathrm{H_2})}= \frac{M(\mathrm{O_2})}{M(\mathrm{H_2})}\end{aligned}:

  • Left-hand side: \displaystyle \frac{m(\mathrm{O_2})}{m(\mathrm{H_2})}= \frac{1.43\; \rm g}{0.089\; \rm g} \approx 16.1.
  • Right-hand side: \displaystyle \frac{M(\mathrm{O_2})}{M(\mathrm{H_2})}= \frac{31.998\; \rm g \cdot mol^{-1}}{2.016\; \rm g \cdot mol^{-1}} \approx 15.9.

Note that the mass of the \rm H_2\; (g) sample comes with only two significant figures. The two sides of this equations would indeed be equal if both values are rounded to two significant figures.

7 0
3 years ago
What is the job of a scientist?
Rudiy27

Answer:

B. To ask and answer scientific questions

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A preliminary untested explanation that tries to explain how or why things happen in the manner observed is a scientific
icang [17]
It is a scientific hypothesis. A scientific hypothesis must be testable, however there is a significantly more grounded necessity that a testable speculation must meet before it can truly be viewed as logical. This foundation comes essentially from crafted by the rationalist of science Karl Popper, and is called "falsifiability".
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can someone answer this question? It's not that long
Kitty [74]

Answer:

sections 2 and 3

Explanation:

logic

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • At what condition to sodium chloride and silver nitrate react
    11·1 answer
  • Which quantities are conserved in all oxidation-reduction reactions?
    14·1 answer
  • I need all the answers to all of them today cause I have to give it in tomorrow
    15·1 answer
  • What causes hail when it rains?
    13·1 answer
  • Which word best describes the upper mantle a) liquid, b) solid, c) plastic-like
    10·2 answers
  • What are bacteria? Are they good or bad?
    12·2 answers
  • How can living things be classified? What are the criteria?
    5·2 answers
  • Grass → rabbit → fox
    11·1 answer
  • HDSJDHAJ SOMEONE HELP ME IM ABOUT TO FAIL MY SCIENCE CLASS
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following is true for the percentage yield of a reaction?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!