I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option B. A parallel circuit differ from a series circuit in a sense that a <span>series circuit has one path for electrons, but a parallel circuit has more than one path. In a parallel circuit there two or more paths for current to flow while a series circuit only has one.</span>
<h3>
Answer:</h3>
35 meters
<h3>
Explanation:</h3>
<u>Data given;</u>
- Velocity of an object = 5 m/s
- Time taken = 7 s
We are required to calculate how far the object traveled.
Velocity = Displacement ÷ time
Displacement = Velocity × time
= 5 m/s × 7 s
= 35 m
Therefore; the object traveled 35 meters
Answer:
<h2><u>Given </u><u>:</u><u>-</u></h2>
- Mass = 1025 kg
- Acceleration = 9.8 m/s²
<h2><u>To </u><u>Find</u><u> </u><u>:</u><u>-</u></h2>
Force
<h2><u>Solution</u><u> </u><u>:</u><u>-</u></h2>
We know that
F = mg
F = 1025 × 9.8
F = 10,045 N
Or,
10045/1000 = 10.045 Kilo Newton

Answer: hope it helps you...❤❤❤❤
Explanation: If your values have dimensions like time, length, temperature, etc, then if the dimensions are not the same then the values are not the same. So a “dimensionally wrong equation” is always false and cannot represent a correct physical relation.
No, not necessarily.
For instance, Newton’s 2nd law is F=p˙ , or the sum of the applied forces on a body is equal to its time rate of change of its momentum. This is dimensionally correct, and a correct physical relation. It’s fine.
But take a look at this (incorrect) equation for the force of gravity:
F=−G(m+M)Mm√|r|3r
It has all the nice properties you’d expect: It’s dimensionally correct (assuming the standard traditional value for G ), it’s attractive, it’s symmetric in the masses, it’s inverse-square, etc. But it doesn’t correspond to a real, physical force.
It’s a counter-example to the claim that a dimensionally correct equation is necessarily a correct physical relation.
A simpler counter example is 1=2 . It is stating the equality of two dimensionless numbers. It is trivially dimensionally correct. But it is false.