The answer plz quickkkk

A 220 kg crate hangs from the end of a rope of length L = 14.0 m. You push horizontally on the crate with a varying force F to m

kifflom [539]

Answer:

(a) magnitude of F = 797 N

(b)the total work done W = 0

(c)work done by the gravitational force = -1.55 kJ

(d)the work done by the pull = 0

(e) work your force F does on the crate = 1.55 kJ

Explanation:

Given:

Mass of the crate, m = 220 kg

Length of the rope, L = 14.0m

Distance, d = 4.00m

(a) What is the magnitude of F when the crate is in this final position

Let us first determine vertical angle as follows

=> $Sin \theta = \frac{d }{L}$

=> $\theta = Sin^{-1} \frac{d}{L}$ =

Now substituting thje values

=> $\theta = Sin^{-1} \frac{4}{12}$ =

=> $\theta = Sin^{-1} \frac{1}{3}$

=> $\theta = Sin^{-1}(0.333)$

=> $\theta = 19.5^{\circ}$

Now the tension in the string resolve into components

The vertical component supports the weight

=> $Tcos\theta = mg$

=> $T = \frac{mg}{cos\theta}$

=> $T = \frac{230 \times 9.8 }{cos(19.5)}$

=> $T = \frac{2254 }{cos(19.5)}$

=> $T = \frac{2254 }{0.9426}$

=>T =2391N

Therefore the horizontal force

$F = TSin(19.5)$

F = 797 N

b) The total work done on it

As there is no change in Kinetic energy

The total work done W = 0

c) The work done by the gravitational force on the crate

The work done by gravity

Wg = Fs.d = - mgh

Wg = - mgL ( 1 - Cosθ )

Substituting the values

= $-230 \times 9.8\times 12 ( 1 - cos(19.5) )$

= $-230 \times 9.8\times 12 ( 1 - 0.9426) )$

= $-230 \times 9.8\times 12 (0.0574)$

= $-230 \times 9.8\times 0.6888$

= $-230 \times 6.750$

= -1552.55 J

The work done by gravity = -1.55 kJ

d) the work done by the pull on the crate from the rope

Since the pull is perpendicular to the direction of motion,

The work done = 0

e)Find the work your force F does on the crate.

Work done by the Force on the crate

WF = - Wg

WF = -(-1.55)

WF = 1.55 kJ

(f) Why is the work of your force not equal to the product of the horizontal displacement and the answer to (a)

Here the work done by force is not equal to F*d

and it is equal to product of the cos angle and F*d

So, it is not equal to the product of the horizontal displacement and the answer to (a)

7 0

4 years ago

The friends take a few minutes to discuss their ideas. Which of Amy's comments with respect to a charged particle moving in a ma

Marizza181 [45]

Answer:

The statement "if the magnetic force is always perpendicular to the velocity, the path of the particle is a straight line" is false.

Explanation:

The equation for the magnetic force on a charge q moving at velocity v on a magnetic field B is given by the (vectorial) Lorentz Force Law $F=qv\times B$

From it we can clearly see that the magnitude of the magnetic force exerted on the particle is proportional to the magnitude of the charge q and to the speed v of the particle, and that it is also perpendicular to the particle's velocity. This means that at each instant it moves perpendicularly to the force, so the work done by the magnetic force on the particle is zero.

The statement "if the magnetic force is always perpendicular to the velocity, the path of the particle is a straight line" is false not only for this but for any force, a force always perpendicular to a velocity will curve the trajectory.

7 0

3 years ago

a student pushes on a crate with a force of 100 N directed to the right. what force does the crate exert on a student

soldi70 [24.7K]

100N to the left. Newton's 3rd law action and reaction

5 0

3 years ago

If a 10kg block is at rest on a table and a 1200N force is applied in the eastward direction for 10 seconds, what is the acceler

gavmur [86]

Answer:

a = 120 m/s²

Explanation:

We apply Newton's second law in the x direction:

∑Fₓ = m*a Formula (1)

Known data

Where:

∑Fₓ: Algebraic sum of forces in the x direction

F: Force in Newtons (N)

m: mass (kg)

a: acceleration of the block (m/s²)

F = 1200N

m = 10 kg

Problem development

We replace the known data in formula (1)

1200 = 10*a

a = 1200/10

a = 120 m/s²

6 0

3 years ago

You and a partner sit on the floor and stretch out a coiled spring to a length of 7.2 meters. You shake the coil so you

vekshin1

Answer:

Approximately $5.9\; {\rm m\cdot s^{-1}}$ (assuming that the partner is holding the other end of the coil stationary.)

Explanation:

In a standing wave, an antinode is a point that moves with maximal amplitude, while a node is a point that does not move at all. There is an antinode between every two adjacent nodes. Likewise, there is a node between every two adjacent antinodes.

The side of the spring that is being shaken moving with maximal amplitude. Hence, that point on this spring would also be an antinode. In contrast, the side of the spring that is held still (does not move at all) would be a node.

There would be a node between:

the antinode at the end of the spring that is being shaken, and
the antinode between the two ends of this spring.

Overall, the nodes and antinodes on this spring would be:

node at the end that is being held still,
antinode (as mentioned in the question),
node (inferred, not mentioned in the question), and
antinode at the end that is being shaken.

The distance between two adjacent nodes is equal to one-half (that is, $(1/2)$ ) the wavelength of the wave. The distance between a node and an adjacent antinode is one-quarter (that is, $(1/4)$ ) of the wavelength of the wave.

Thus, if the wavelength of the wave in this question is $\lambda$ , the length of this spring would be:

$\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}\, \lambda + \frac{1}{4}\, \lambda = \frac{3}{4}\, \lambda$ .

The question states that the length of this coiled spring is $7.2\; {\rm m}$ . In other words, $(3/4) \, \lambda = 7.2\; {\rm m}$ . The wavelength of this wave would be $(7.2\; {\rm m}) / (3/4) = 9.6\; {\rm m}$ .

The frequency $f$ of this wave is the number of cycles in unit time:

$\begin{aligned} f &= \frac{10}{16.3\; {\rm s}} \approx 0.613\; {\rm s^{-1}}\end{aligned}$ .

Hence, the speed $v$ of this wave would be:

$\begin{aligned} v &= \lambda\, f \\ &=9.6\; {\rm m} \times 0.613\; {\rm s^{-1}} \\ &\approx 5.9\; {\rm m \cdot s^{-1}}\end{aligned}$ .

3 0

2 years ago