To start with solving this
problem, let us assume a launch angle of 45 degrees since that gives out the
maximum range for given initial speed. Also assuming that it was launched at
ground level since no initial height was given. Using g = 9.8 m/s^2, the
initial velocity is calculated using the formula:
(v sinθ)^2 = (v0 sinθ)^2
– 2 g d
where v is final
velocity = 0 at the peak, v0 is the initial velocity, d is distance = 11 m
Rearranging to find for
v0: <span>
v0 = sqrt (d * g/ sin(2 θ)) </span>
<span>v0 = 10.383 m/s</span>
Answer with Explanation:
We are given that
String makes an angle w.r.t vertical=
a.We have to derive an expression for the magnitude of the acceleration of the van in terms of the angle 
and magnitude g of the acceleration due to gravity.
According to newton's second law
b.
c.Velocity=Constant
We have to find the angle
Because they are not supported by the results of any legitimate investigation
that's conducted in accordance with the Scientific Method.
You may say:
"Well then, teach both lines of reasoning,
and let each student decide for himself."
This is suggested by the same people who aren't ready to let their
fourth-grader choose his own clothing, dinner menu, or school.
And it sounds reasonable to a vast mass of citizens who have decided
for them selves that the jury is still out on climate change.
What I'm saying is this:
-- The Scientific Method is a METHOD of investigation that's designed
and developed to remove the effects of human prejudice from the
collection and evaluation of evidence, and to be able to tell bogus
conclusions apart from true ones. It's the most reliable way we have
of asking and answering questions about the natural world.
-- Some questions CAN'T be studied with the Scientific Method,
because experiments generally can't be constructed. These include
matters of religion and faith. Nobody can flatly state that those are
right or wrong. We have no reliable way to say, either way.
The only way to decide is . . . faith.
-- It is illegitimate to take the answer to a question of faith that can't be
derived scientifically, and a scientifically derived conclusion, set them
down next to each other on the same table, and pretend that they can be
compared.
-- When you put them next to each other, say that they're equivalent,
and tell people "go ahead and choose one or the other", the situation
is bogus, the comparison is dishonest, and people who are untrained
or uneducated or immature are not qualified to "choose".
That's why.
This is my opinion. I could be wrong.
Personally, I happen to be a believer. But I cannot prove anything I believe
to anyone else ... not with rational argument, and not with evidence. Those are
elements of the scientific method. They're not applicable, and they don't work,
in matters of faith.
Answer:
1.5 x 10⁵ W
Explanation:
A = Area of the fresh lava = 1.02 m²
T = Temperature of fresh lava = 1000 °C = 1000 + 273 = 1273 K
T₀ = Temperature of surrounding = 25.3 °C = 25.3 + 273 = 298.3 K
ε = emissivity of the lava = 0.97
σ = stefan's constant = 5.67 x 10⁻⁸ Wm⁻²K⁻⁴
Rate of transfer is given as
E = σ ε A (T⁴ - T₀⁴)
E = (5.67 x 10⁻⁸) (0.97) (1.02) ((1273)⁴ - (298.3)⁴)
E = 1.5 x 10⁵ W
Answer: Laser optics is an laser instrumentation that is used to material processing which uses also coatings,substrates,and of different wavelengths of a superior performance
Explanation:
