Answer:
Explanation:
One of the major differences between nuclear reactions and chemical reactions is that nuclear reactions involve larger amount of energy than chemical energy. <u>This is because the force between the protons and neutrons in the nucleus of an atom is much higher than the force of attraction between electrons and the positively charged nucleus, hence nuclear reactions involves/requires a larger amount of energy (because it's reactions involve the nucleus) than chemical reactions (because it's reactions involve the electrons)</u>.
Thus, during nuclear fusion, two light nuclei are bombarded against one another to produce a larger/heavier nuclei with the release of large amount of energy (because the forces between the protons and neutrons are much higher) unlike when two atoms/molecules are chemically combined together to form a new molecule with the rearrangement of electrons in the valence shells of the participating molecules.
The difference between the observed points and the regression line points is equal to the correlation.
The strength and direction of a relationship between two or more variables are described by the statistical measure of correlation, which is given as a number. However, a correlation between two variables does not necessarily imply that a change in one variable is the reason for a change in the values of the other.
Regression expresses the relationship as an equation, whereas correlation assesses the strength of the linear link between two variables. The square of the correlation coefficient, also known as Pearson's r, between the observed and predicted values in a regression is sometimes referred to as R2.
Learn more about correlation here;
brainly.com/question/6563788
#SPJ4
Answer:
Explanation:
Giant impact has resulted into formation of celestial bodies such as moon.
Moon was formed years after the Earth was formed. When Earth collided with very big size bodies, there was vaporization of chunks of the planets in to the space. Gravity plays its role and bounded those particles together thus forming moon.
This formation explains Moon is made up of lighter elements and contains too little iron where as Mercury was formed with the rest of the planets and just like earth, its core is formed first which is of iron and then collected the lighter elements to form crust and mantle.
Though both Moon and Mercury were the result of giant impacts yet they have different elements because mercury was made earlier and its is closer to moon hence it collected heavy elements such as iron to for the formation where as moon is the result of collision of Earth and other Mars- sized body hence its constituent particles are different that of mercury.
