1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marina CMI [18]
3 years ago
9

A sprinter runs for 6.45 s at 7.44 m/s. How far does she get?

Physics
1 answer:
Gwar [14]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

D is the answer

Explanation:

6.45×7.44= 47.98800

Which if we round of we get 48m

You might be interested in
a body of radius R and mass m is rolling horizontally without slipping with speed v. it then rolls us a hill to a maximum height
ki77a [65]

Answer:

mR²/2

Explanation:

Here is the complete question

An object of radius′

R′  and mass ′

M′  is rolling horizontally without slipping with speed ′

V′

. It then rolls up the hill to a maximum height h = 3v²/4g. The moment of inertia of the object is (g= acceleration due to gravity)

Solution

Since it rolls without slipping, there is no friction. So, its initial mechanical energy at the horizontal surface equals its final mechanical energy at the top of the hill.

Since the object is rolling initially, and on horizontal ground, it initial energy is kinetic and made up of rotational and translational kinetic energy.

So, E = K + K'

E = 1/2mv² + 1/2Iω² where m = mass of object, v = speed of object, I = moment of inertia of object and ω = angular speed of object = v/r where v = speed of object and R = radius of object.

Also, the final mechanical energy of the object, E' is its potential energy at the top of the hill. So, E' = mgh.

Since E = E',

1/2mv² + 1/2Iω² = mgh

substituting the values of ω and h into the equation, we have

1/2mv² + 1/2Iω² = mgh

1/2mv² + 1/2I(v/R)²= mg(3v²/4g)

Expanding the brackets, we have

1/2mv² + 1/2Iv²/R²= 3mv²/4

Dividing through by v², we have

1/2m + I/2R²= 3m/4

Subtracting m/2 from both sides, we have

I/2R² = 3m/4 - m/2

Simplifying, we have

I/2R² = m/4

Multiplying through by 2R², we have

I = m/4 × 2R²

I = mR²/2

6 0
3 years ago
Cations have fewer _____ than _____.
FrozenT [24]
Cations are positively charged ions. And for positive charged ions, it means the positive charges, protons, are more than the negative charges, the electrons.

Therefore Cations have fewer electrons than protons.

So the answer is:    c. electrons; protons. 
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A piece of solid copper, at 10oC, is dropped into a graduated cylinder of 100°C water. Which statement BEST describes the change
enot [183]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

just took the test

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why society might initially reject a new scientific theory?
Irina18 [472]

I was about to say:  because people generally get comfortable with
what they think they know, and don't like the discomfort of being told
that they have to change something they're comfortable with.

But then I thought about it a little bit more, and I have a different answer.

"Society" might initially reject a new scientific theory, because 'society'
is totally unequipped to render judgement of any kind regarding any
development in Science. 

First of all, 'Society' is a thing that's made of a bunch of people, so it's
inherently unequipped to deal with scientific news.  Anything that 'Society'
decides has a lot of the mob psychology in it, and a public opinion poll or
a popularity contest are terrible ways to evaluate a scientific discovery.

Second, let's face it.  The main ingredient that comprises 'Society' ... people ...
are generally uneducated, unknowledgeable, unqualified, and clueless in the
substance, the history, and the methods of scientific inquiry and reporting.

There may be very good reasons that some particular a new scientific theory
should be rejected, or at least seriously questioned.  But believe me, 'Society'
doesn't have them.

That's pretty much why.
 
6 0
3 years ago
Light travels in a straight line at a constant speed of 300000 m/s. What is the acceleration of light?
mafiozo [28]

Answer:

As light travels in a straight line at a constant speed, it's acceleration is <u>0 m/s²</u>.

There is no rate of change of speed, so there is no acceleration.

  • <u>0 m/s²</u> is the right answer.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A baseball is thrown vertically up to a height of 30 m on Earth. If the same ball is thrown up on the moon with the same initial
    6·1 answer
  • What is the fundamental source of all energy in the universe
    11·1 answer
  • Which scenario best describes motion? a toy train in position 4 on a number line a race track that is 100 meters long a ball rol
    12·2 answers
  • Nuclear fission can be described as a chain reaction.<br> a. True<br> b. False
    13·2 answers
  • Describe the changes in the field of view and the amount of available light when going from low to high power using the compound
    12·1 answer
  • You are going to an outdoor concert, and you'll be standing near a speaker that emits 60 W of acoustic power as a spherical wave
    9·1 answer
  • Calculate the magnitude of the force the jumper must exert on the ground to produce an upward acceleration 4.00 times the accele
    9·2 answers
  • If you drop a bar of soap on the floor is it clean or dirty
    10·2 answers
  • Which descriptions apply to Mendels pea plant experiments ? Select three options
    5·1 answer
  • SOMONE PLEASE HELP ASAP!!!!
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!