No waves because Q19 waves would going at the surface at regions
The correct answer is Model A shows the three-dimensional shape of the molecule, but Model B does not.
Explanation:
Model A and B show the structure of a molecule. In the case of model A, the structure is represented through the use of three-dimensional shapes, while in model B the structure is represented using the letters of each element and showing how each element is connected to others.
In this context, one feature that makes model A better is that this represents the molecule using a 3D model, which is better to understand how the molecule looks like and what is its structure. Moreover, both models are alike because they show the number of atoms of each element, although model A does not show the types of elements.
1. Based on Scenario A, multiple frames will minimize re-transmission overhead and should be preferred in the encapsulation of packets.
2. Based on Scenario B, the encapsulation of packets should be in a single frame because of the high level of network reliability and accuracy.
<u>Justification:</u>
There will not be further need to re-transmit the packets in a highly reliable and accurate network environment, unlike in an environment that is very prone to errors. The reliable and accurate network environment makes a single frame economically better.
Encapsulation involves the process of wrapping code and data together within a class so that data is protected and access to code is restricted.
With encapsulation, each layer:
- provides a service to the layer above it
- communicates with a corresponding receiving node
Thus, in a reliable and accurate network environment, single frames should be used to enhance transmission and minimize re-transmission overhead. This is unlike in an environment that is very prone to errors, where multiple frames should rather be used to minimize re-transmission overhead.
Learn more about encapsulation of packets here: brainly.com/question/22471914
