1. Life is meaningless.
2. 42
The number of electrons emitted from the metal per second increases if the intensity of the incident light is increased.
Answer: Option B
<u>Explanation:</u>
As a result of photoelectric effect, electrons are emitted by the light incident on a metal surface. The emitted electrons count and its kinetic energy can measure as the function of light intensity and frequency. Like physicists, at the 20th century beginning, it should be expected that the light wave's energy (its intensity) will be transformed into the kinetic energy of emitted electrons.
In addition, the electrons count emitting from metal must vary with light wave frequency. This frequency relationship was expected because the electric field oscillates due to the light wave and the metal electrons react to different frequencies. In other words, the number of electrons emitted was expected to be frequency dependent and their kinetic energy should be dependent on the intensity (constant wavelength) of light.
Thus, the maximum in kinetic energy of electrons emitted increases with increase in light's frequency and is experimentally independent of light intensity. So, the number of emitted electrons is proportionate to the intensity of the incident light.
Answer:
Over such small distances, digital data may be transmitted as direct, two-level electrical signals over simple copper conductors. This results from the electrical distortion of signals traveling through long conductors, and from noise added to the signal as it propagates through a transmission medium.
Answer:
The ball would have landed 3.31m farther if the downward angle were 6.0° instead.
Explanation:
In order to solve this problem we must first start by doing a drawing that will represent the situation. (See picture attached).
We can see in the picture that the least the angle the farther the ball will go. So we need to find the A and B position to determine how farther the second shot would go. Let's start with point A.
So, first we need to determine the components of the velocity of the ball, like this:
we pick the positive one, so it takes 0.317s for the ball to hit on point A.
so now we can find the distance from the net to point A with this time. We can find it like this:
Once we found the distance between the net and point A, we can similarly find the distance between the net and point B:
t= -0.9159s or t=0.468s
we pick the positive one, so it takes 0.468s for the ball to hit on point B.
so now we can find the distance from the net to point B with this time. We can find it like this:
So once we got the two distances we can now find the difference between them:
so the ball would have landed 3.31m farther if the downward angle were 6.0° instead.
Answer:
-30° C
Explanation:
Data provided in the problem:
The formula for conversion as:
F = (9/5)C + 32
Now,
for the values of F = -22 , C = ?
Substituting the value of F in the above formula, we get
-22 = (9/5)C + 32
or
-22 - 32 = (9/5)C
or
(9/5)C = - 54
or
C = - 54 × (5/9)
or
C = - 30 °
Hence, -22 Fahrenheit equals to -30°C
