The density of the nickel was greater than that of the quarter and penny, thus, the results supports the hypothesis.
<h3>What is density of substance?</h3>
The density of a substance is a measure of how tightly-packed the particles of the substance are.
Density is calculated as the ratio of the mass of the substance and the volume of the substance.
The hypothesis of the lab to compare the densities of a penny, a nickel, and a quarter is:
- If the nickel has a greater density than the quarter and penny, then it will have a greater mass to volume ratio. If the nickel has a lower density than the quarter and penny, then it will have a lower mass-to-volume ratio.
The average mass and the average volume of a penny, a nickel, and a quarter are then used to determine the density of each coin.
Based on obtained results, it would be found that the density of the nickel was greater than that of the quarter and penny. Therefore, the results supports the hypothesis.
In conclusion, the density of a substance depends on the mass and the volume.
Learn more about density at: brainly.com/question/1354972
#SPJ1
Answer:
Neutrally charged!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Explanation:
Answer:
p = 1.16 10⁻¹⁴ C m and ΔU = 2.7 10 -11 J
Explanation:
The dipole moment of a dipole is the product of charges by distance
p = 2 a q
With 2a the distance between the charges and the magnitude of the charges
p = 1.7 10⁻⁹ 6.8 10⁻⁶
p = 1.16 10⁻¹⁴ C m
The potential energie dipole is described by the expression
U = - p E cos θ
Where θ is the angle between the dipole and the electric field, the zero value of the potential energy is located for when the dipole is perpendicular to the electric field line
Orientation parallel to the field
θ = 0º
U = 1.16 10⁻¹⁴ 1160 cos 0
U1 = 1.35 10⁻¹¹ J
Antiparallel orientation
θ = 180º
cos 180 = -1
U2 = -1.35 10⁻¹¹ J
The difference in energy between these two configurations is the subtraction of the energies
ΔU = | U1 -U2 |
ΔU = 1.35 10-11 - (-1.35 10-11)
ΔU = 2.7 10 -11 J
this is an equation that you need to solve for motional emf. motional emf=vBL, where v is velocity in meters/second, B is magnetic field in Teslas and L is length or distance the rails are apart from each other. when we plug everything into the formula given above, we get: motional emf=5m/s*0.80T*0.20m. solving all this we get 0.8 volts. pretty sure that since they are giving you the direction of the field, they want to know which way the current will flow . since the conductor is moving from left to right the area of the field is increasing which means magnetic flux is increasing as Ф(magnetic flux)=B(magnetic field)*A(area)*cosФ(little phi is the angle to the normal. in this case little fee is 0 degrees so the cosФ doesn't matter). so ↑Ф=B↑A. if magnetic flux is increasing, the induced magnetic field is in the opposite direction as the original magnetic field meaning the induced magnetic field will be out of the page. using the right hand rule which says that if the field is in to the page, the current should go clockwise and if the field is out of the page, the current is counterclockwise so that means that the current should be going counter clockwise since the induced field is going out of the screen. the top of the conducting wire will have its current go to the left and the bottom of the conducting wire will have the current go to the right.
Answer:
Too old(Ex. if real time is 1000 then they estimate >1000)
Explanation:
This is because with time our planet may have a definite function which describes temperature.(Because of all the factors and global warming except nuclear bomb testing)
Now nuclear test on planet have significant effect on temperature rise.
Also 14°C rise in temperature is good one because of this.
If future archaeologists only consider that uniform function as above mentioned then they estimate more time then the real one.
Thus too old is right answer.