1. Velocity
2. Time
3. Idk
4. Idk
5. D. I think it may be A. but I think D.
The tension in the first and second rope are; 147 Newton and 98 Newton respectively.
Given the data in the question
- Mass of first block;

- Mass of second block,

- Tension on first rope;

- Tension on second rope;
To find the Tension in each of the ropes, we make use of the equation from Newton's Second Laws of Motion:

Where F is the force, m is the mass of the object and a is the acceleration ( In this case the block is under gravity. Hence ''a" becomes acceleration due to gravity
)
For the First Rope
Total mass hanging on it; 
So Tension of the rope;

Therefore, the tension in the first rope is 147 Newton
For the Second Rope
Since only the block of mass 10kg is hang from the second, the tension in the second rope will be;

Therefore, the tension in the second rope is 98 Newton
Learn More, brainly.com/question/18288215
<span>Indeed, this is one of the odd results in physics. A system of two polarizing filters arranged as shown below trasmits no light.</span>
Ok i apologise for the messy working but I'll try and explain my attempt at logic
Also note i ignore any air resistance for this.
First i wrote the two equations I'd most likely need for this situation, the kinetic energy equation and the potential energy equation.
Because the energy right at the top of the swing motion is equal to the energy right in the "bottom" of the swing's motion (due to conservation of energy), i made the kinetic energy equal to the potential energy as indicated by Ek = Ep.
I also noted the "initial" and "final" height of the swing with hi and hf respectively.
So initially looking at this i thought, what the heck, there's no mass. Then i figured that using the conservation of energy law i could take the mass value from the Ek equation and use it in the Ep equation. So what i did was take the Ek equation and rearranged it for m as you can hopefully see. Then i substituted the rearranged Ek equation into the Ep equation.
So then the equation reads something like Ep = (rearranged Ek equation for m) × g (which is -9.81) × change in height (hf - hi).
Then i simplify the equation a little. When i multiply both sides by v^2 i can clearly see that there is one E on each side (at that stage i don't need to clarify which type of energy it is because Ek = Ep so they're just the same anyway). So i just canceled them out and square rooted both sides.
The answer i got was that the max velocity would be 4.85m/s 3sf, assuming no losses (eg energy lost to friction).
I do hope I'm right and i suppose it's better than a blank piece of paper good luck my dude xx
Answer:
Your answer is D It does not need to be repeatable.
the reason for this is because C is correct.
You need to be able to experiment on something multiple times so that you can gather further data to imbedded your evidence in facts.