All categories

2 years ago

Someone pls help I don’t understand this

Physics

1 answer:

ozzi2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

${ \rm{F _{ball \: on \: bat} = - F _{bat \: on \: ball} }}$

Explanation:

• This is due to the third newtons law of motion which states that "Every action has an equal and opposite reaction".

You might be interested in

Which of the following can be explained with science? A.Plant growth B.Career options C.Moral value D.Meaning of life

Mnenie [13.5K]

The answer is A. Plant growth, Plant growth is the only thing that can actually be tested and scientificly measured, hope this helps!!!!

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Electronic flash units for camera contain a capacitor for storing the energy used to produce the flash. In one such unit, the fl

nadezda [96]

Answer:

420J

Explanation:

Power is the time rate of change in energy. Power is the ratio of energy to time. The S.I unit of power is in watts.

Given that the flash lasts for 1/675 s, power output is 2.7 * 10⁵ W. Hence:

Power = Energy / time

Substituting:

2.7 * 10⁵ W = Energy / (1/675)

Energy = 2.7 * 10⁵ W * 1/675 = 400J

Therefore the energy emitted as light is 400J.

Since the conversion of electric energy to light is 95% efficient, hence the energy stored as electrical energy is:

Energy(capacitor) = 5% of 400J + 400J = 0.05*400 + 400

Energy(capacitor) = 420J

8 0

2 years ago

In a double slit experiment, if the separation between the two slits is 0.050 mm and the distance from the slits to a screen is

meriva

The spacing between the first-order and second-order bright fringes is 3 cm. Hence, this is the required solution.

<h3>What is double slit experiment?</h3>

The double-slit experiment serves as a proof in current physics that both light and matter may exhibit properties of classically defined waves and particles. It also illustrates the inherently probabilistic nature of quantum mechanical events. Thomas Young carried out the first experiment of this kind employing light in 1802, illustrating how light behaves like a wave. It was formerly believed that light was made up of either waves or particles. About a century later, with the advent of modern physics, it was discovered that light may in fact exhibit behaviour like that of both waves and particles. The identical behaviour of electrons was first shown by Davisson and Germer in 1927, and it was later extended to atoms and molecules.

The separation between the slits, d = 0.05mm = 5×10⁻⁵ m

The distance from the slits to a screen, D = 2.5 m

Let x is the spacing between the first-order and second-order bright fringes when coherent light of wavelength 600 nm illuminates the slits,

λ = 600nm = 6× 10⁻⁷ m

We know that the bright fringe is given by :

y = nλD/d

So, the spacing between the first-order and second-order bright fringes is :

x = 2λD/d - λD/d

x = λD/d

x = 6 × 10⁻⁷ × 2.5/5 × 10⁻⁵

x = 0.03 m

x = 3 cm

So, the spacing between the first-order and second-order bright fringes is 3 cm. Hence, this is the required solution.

to learn more about double slit experiment go to -

brainly.com/question/28108126

#SPJ4

8 0

1 year ago

Tenemos un Cable de cobre de 1 km de longitud cuya sección es de 2 milímetros al cuadrado y queremos saber la resistencia que se

Nady [450]

Answer:

8.5 Ω

Explanation:

La resistencia de un material es directamente proporcional a su longitud e inversamente proporcional al área de la sección transversal.

La fórmula de la resistencia (R) viene dada por:

R = ρL/A

Donde ρ es la resistividad del material, L es la longitud del material y A es el área de la sección transversal del material.

Dado que:

L = 1 km = 1000 m, A = 2 mm² = 2 * 10⁻⁶ m², ρ (cobre) = 1.7 * 10⁻⁸ Ωm

Sustituyendo da:

R = 1,7 * 10⁻⁸ * 1000/2 * 10⁻⁶

R = 8.5 Ω

7 0

2 years ago

The current through an inductor of inductance L is given by I(t) = Imax sin(ωt).

sammy [17]

Answer:

(a) $emf_L=-LI_{max}\omega cos(\omega t)$

(b) neither increasing or decreasing

Explanation:

The current through an inductor of inductance L is given by:

$I(t)=I_{max}sin(\omega t)$ (1)

(a) The induced emf is given by the following formula

$emf_L=-L\frac{dI}{dt}$ (2)

You derivative the expression (1) in the expression (2):

$emf_L=-L\frac{d}{dt}(I_{max}sin(\omega t))\\\\emf_L=-LI_{max}\omega cos(\omega t)$

(b) At t=0 the current is zero

(c) At t = 0 the emf is:

$emf_L=-\omega LI_{max}$

w, L and Imax have positive values, then the emf is negative. Hence, the induced emf is opposite to the flow of the charge carriers.

(d) read the text carefully

6 0

3 years ago