1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
marin [14]
3 years ago
15

why is it harder to remove an electron from fluorine than from carbon? to put it another way, why are the outermost electrons of

fluorine more tightly held by the nucleus than those of carbon?
Chemistry
1 answer:
Verizon [17]3 years ago
6 0

It is harder to remove an electron from fluorine than from carbon because the size of the nuclear charge in fluorine is larger than that of carbon.

The energy required to remove an electron from an atom is called ionization energy.

The ionization energy largely depends on the size of the nuclear charge. The larger the size of the nuclear charge, the higher the ionization energy because it will be more difficult to remove an electron from the atom owing to increased electrostatic attraction between the nucleus and orbital electrons.

Since fluorine has a higher size of the nuclear charge than carbon. More energy is required to remove an electron from fluorine than from carbon leading to the observation that;  it is harder to remove an electron from fluorine than from carbon.

Learn more: brainly.com/question/16243729

You might be interested in
A neutral atom has 1 valence electron and its atomic mass is 39. How many
uranmaximum [27]

Answer: I think probaly wrong so probaly dont

listen to me

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Which is a characteristic of nuclear fusion?
Alja [10]
The best answer is #2

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A family from Texas flies to Washington, D.C. in an airplane traveling 1,362 miles in 3 hours. What is the average speed in mile
Lady bird [3.3K]

Answer:

The answer is 454

Explanation:

1362 divided by 3 = 454

4 0
3 years ago
If matter is neither created nor destroyed, why can’t we just go directly from grams of reactant to grams of product?
algol [13]
Not all matter in the reactant goes to the product. Some matter is byproducts.
4 0
3 years ago
In the reaction N2 + 3H2 - 2NH3, how many
dalvyx [7]

Answer:

B. 2g

Explanation:

So first you have to find the mole to mole ratio then convert it to grams if that makes sense. So the mole to mole ratio is 2 ammonia to 3 hydrogen gas. So then after you do that conversion you can solve for grams then. Sorry I am not that great at explaining.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following instruments is used to measure air pressure?
    5·1 answer
  • How to calculate the number of moles of an element from percentage composition
    12·1 answer
  • Propane (C3H8), a common fuel, reacts with oxygen to form carbon dioxide and water according to the equation below: C3H8 + 5O2 →
    8·1 answer
  • What happens before mitosis occurs?
    6·1 answer
  • A 1.52-gram sample of iron (III) perchlorate was decomposed according to the reaction below, producing 575 mL of oxygen gas at 2
    6·1 answer
  • Choose all the answers that apply.
    9·2 answers
  • Trans-4-hexen-3-ol can be synthesized starting from acetaldehyde. One of the key reagents is ethyl grignard.
    12·1 answer
  • Calculate the number of molecules found in 35 g of Sodium Hydroxide?
    6·2 answers
  • Unsa ang karaan nga duwa saonang panaho​
    13·1 answer
  • Read the scenario. is this an example of weather, climate, or neither?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!