Yes, our friend is right, because there is no contradiction to the law of conservation of mass in the above equation. It just the mass of the product is equal to the mass of reactants.. and that is shown in the equation you have presented earlier
<span>120 miles is the answer
</span>
Answer:
The best description of inertia is an objects velocity
We can use the kinematic equation

where Vf is what we are looking for
Vi is 0 since we start from rest
a is acceleration
and d is the distance
we get
(Vf)^2 = (0)^2 + 2*(2)*(500)
(Vf)^2 = 2000
Vf = about 44.721
or 44.7 m/s [if you are rounding this by significant figures]
Answer:
38 cm from q1(right)
Explanation:
Given, q1 = 3q2 , r = 60cm = 0.6 m
Let that point be situated at a distance of 'x' m from q1.
Electric field must be same from both sides to be in equilibrium(where EF is 0).
=> k q1/x² = k q2/(0.6 - x)²
=> q1(0.6 - x)² = q2(x)²
=> 3q2(0.6 - x)² = q2(x)²
=> 3(0.6 - x)² = x²
=> √3(0.6 - x) = ± x
=> 0.6√3 = x(1 + √3)
=> 1.03/2.73 = x
≈ 0.38 m = 38 cm = x