3-SAT ≤p TSP
If P ¹ NP, then no NP-complete problem can be solved in polynomial time.
both the statements are true.
<u>Explanation:</u>
- 3-SAT ≤p TSP due to any complete problem of NP to other problem by exits of reductions.
- If P ¹ NP, then 3-SAT ≤p 2-SAT are the polynomial time algorithm are not for 3-SAT. In P, 2-SAT is found, 3- SAT polynomial time algorithm implies the exit of reductions. 3 SAT does not have polynomial time algorithm when P≠NP.
- If P ¹ NP, then no NP-complete problem can be solved in polynomial time. because for the NP complete problem individually gets the polynomial time algorithm for the others. It may be in P for all the problems, the implication of latter is P≠NP.
Answer:
The lunar radiation environment, allowing scientists to determine potential impacts to astronauts and other life. It also will test models on the effects of radiation and measure radiation absorption by a type of plastic that is like human tissue. The results could aid in the development of protective technologies to help keep future lunar crew members safe. CRaTER was built and developed by Boston University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Boston.
Answer:
(b) False
Explanation:
The specific internal energy of the system does not depend on the path of the process, it is a state function means its depend on only on the initial and the final position it does not depend on the path which it follow in the process.Internal energy is associated with the random motion of the molecules.
So it is false statement as internal energy is not a path function
Answer:
Being innovative means doing things differently or doing things that have never been done before. An innovator is someone who has embraced this idea and creates environments in which employees are given the tools and resources to challenge the status quo, push boundaries and achieve growth.
Explanation:
Hope it helps..
But it's a little bit long..
Correct me if I'm wrong..
