Answer:
Molar mass = 94972.745 g/mol
Explanation:
Given data:
Density = 2.25 g/ml
Pressure = 700 mmHg
Temperature = 200°C
Molar mass = ?
Solution:
Density = 2.25 g/ml (2.25×1000 = 2250 g/L)
Pressure = 700 mmHg (700/760 = 0.92 atm)
Temperature = 200°C (200+273 = 473K)
Formula:
d = PM/RT
M = dRT/P
M = 2250 g/L × 0.0821 atm.L /mol.K × 473K / 0.92 atm
M = 87374.93 g/mol / 0.92
M = 94972.745 g/mol
Answer:
Explanation:
Ksp(BaSO4)=1.07×10−10
BaSO₄ → Ba²⁺ + SO₄²⁻
1.07×10⁻¹⁰ = ( Ba²⁺) × ( SO₄²⁻)
but Ba²⁺ = 1.3×10⁻² M
1.07×10⁻¹⁰ = 1.3×10⁻² M × ( SO₄²⁻)
( SO₄²⁻) = 1.07×10⁻¹⁰ / 1.3×10⁻² = 0.823 × 10⁻⁸ M
while Ksp(CaSO4)=7.10×10−5
CaSO₄ → Ca²⁺ + SO₄²⁻
7.10×10⁻⁵ = 2.0×10⁻² × ( SO₄²⁻)
( SO₄²⁻) = 7.10×10⁻⁵ / 2.0×10⁻² = 3.55 × 10⁻³ M
comparing the concentration of sulfate ions, Ba²⁺ cation will precipitate first because the Ba²⁺ requires 0.823 × 10⁻⁸ M sodium sulfate which less compared the about needed by CaSO₄
Answer:
C and D
Explanation:
Claims based on science are claims that can be backed up by data and evidence. In the sentence "Data from ice cores show that global temperatures are rising dramatically.", the part "Data from" inclines that there is factually proof backing up the claim. Part of the sentence "Satellite imagery shows.." inclines that there is also proof/evidence backing this claim. The other two sentences are <em>opinions</em> based on science. Instead, they should give some sort of data/evidence that would support that claim.
