What is a better way to harness the energy of a flowing river than traditional damming?

1 answer:

8 0

One method that may be used to replace traditional damming is the use of sub-surface dams to prevent the environmental consequences of dams while still harnessing the flowing water.

<h3>What is a sub-surface dam?</h3>

Just as it sounds, it is a dam that is built underneath the surface.
The aim is to harness the energy of flowing groundwater.
This results in less water becoming stagnant, as with traditional dams.
They also reduce the risk of floods and the rate of evaporation of the water.
This all results in many positive environmental and ecosystem benefits.

Therefore, we can confirm that the building of a sub-surface dam would result in less water being lost to evaporation, as well as the ecosystem benefits of not completely stopping the flow of water the way a traditional dam does.

To learn more about dams visit:

brainly.com/question/6592407?referrer=searchResults

You might be interested in

How many formula units are in 0.96 moles of H2O

never [62]

Answer:

18.02 amu

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Given R

icang [17]

Answer:

Explanation:

there are a certain amount of atoms

6 0

3 years ago

C3H8 + O2 → CO2 + H2O

Irina18 [472]

Explanation:

Balance the following equation: C3H8 + O2 ----> CO2 + H2O. (There will be no need for state symbols.) First of all, to balance these equations, list the number of each atom, for both sides of the equation. In this example, it would be: The first step would be to balance out the carbons on the products side by multiplying CO2 by 3. The balanced chemical equation for C3H8 +O2 = CO2 + H2O is C3H8 +5O2 = 3CO2 +4H2O. This is the chemical reaction in which C3H8 or propane burns in air or oxygen to produce carbon dioxide and water.

6 0

3 years ago

A compound contains only carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen. combustion of 11.75 mg of the compound yields 17.61 mg co2 and 4.81 mg h2

Ymorist [56]

Number of moles is defined as the ratio of given mass in g to the molar mass.

First, convert the given mass of carbon dioxide in mg to g:

1 mg = 0.001 g

17.61 mg = 0.01761 g

Number of moles of carbon dioxide = $\frac{0.01761 g}{44.01 g/mol}$