Answer:
Explanation:
1. Impulse, I = F.t
The statement impulse is the product of Force and distance is false.
2. F = m g
Force necessary to lift the object depends on the mass of the object.
statement 2 is false.
3. Joule is equal to Newton times meter.
Statement 3 is false.
4. Work done to lift an object is correct statement.
Statement 4 is true.
5. Kinetic energy of an object is due to motion.
Statement 5 is false.
6. Stopping distance is directly proportional to the square of velocity.
If velocity is doubled, stopping distance is quadrupled.
Statement 6 is false.
Answer:
The mass is 
Explanation:
From the question we are told that
The extension of the rod is 
The area is 
The density increase as follows 
The equation 
at 
So
=> 
So at 
, 
So
=> 
Now
![m = 8 [{2.5 +\frac{ 1.27x^2}{2} } ]\left | 13} \atop {0}} \right.](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=m%20%20%3D%20%208%20%20%20%5B%7B2.5%20%2B%5Cfrac%7B%201.27x%5E2%7D%7B2%7D%20%7D%20%5D%5Cleft%20%20%7C%2013%7D%20%5Catop%20%7B0%7D%7D%20%5Cright.)
![m = 8 [{2.5 +\frac{ 1.27(13)^2}{2} } ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=m%20%20%3D%20%208%20%20%20%5B%7B2.5%20%2B%5Cfrac%7B%201.27%2813%29%5E2%7D%7B2%7D%20%7D%20%5D)
KE = 1/2 * m* v^2
= 1/2 * 40 * 225
= 4500 J
hope it helped
Answer:
1.76 m/s^2
Explanation:
The formula to find the force is F = ma (reference from 2nd law of Newton's Laws of Motion). Since you need to find the acceleration of the box, you need to use the formula a = f/m
a = 9.7 n divided by 5.5 kg = 1.76 m/s^2
None of the choices is an acceptable answer.
Light ... as well as all other forms of electromagnetic radiation ... is both. When you run light through an experiment built to detect particles ... such as photoelectric stimulation of electron emission ... the light behaves like a stream of particles. When you set up an experiment built to measure and detect waves ... like reflection, refraction, diffraction, dispersion, constructive and destructive interference ... the light does all of those things too.
Scientists would only debate the question if light absolutely positively had to be one or the other, and could not possibly be both. Such a debate isn't necessary, and scientists no longer waste their time arguing about it. Light is both.
Between Maxwell and Einstein, the wave/particle duality of light had been convincingly demonstrated well over a hundred years ago.
