Which statement is best supported by this scale? (LT 2)
2 answers:
You might be interested in
Answer:
1) 1,1,1-trichloropropane
2) 1,1,2-trichloropropane
3) 1,2,2-trichloropropane
4) 1,2,3-trichloropropane
Explanation:
For this question, we must remember that isomers are molecules that have the <em>same formula but different structure</em>s. For the formula we can draw a <u>linear chain of three carbons</u> and change the position of the chlorine atoms in the carbon chain.
With this in mind, if we put all the chlorine atoms on the same carbon we will get <u>1,1,1-trichloropropane</u>. If we change an atom from chlorine to carbon 2 we will obtain <u>1,1,2-trichloropropane</u>. If we move another chlorine atom to carbon two we will get <u>1,2,2-trichloropropane</u>. Finally, if we put a chlorine atom in each carbon we will obtain <u>1,2,3-trichloropropane</u>.
See figure one for further explanations
I hope it helps!
Answer:
1. 2Ca + N → 2CaN
2. 4Li + O → 2Li
O
3. 2KCl + BaF → 2KF + BaCl
4. CH + 2O
→ CO
+ 2H
O
Be sure to balance the number of atoms on both sides of each equation only by adding coefficients to the compounds!!!! Those without a coefficient are meant to have a coefficient of 1.
Answer:
The simplified mechanism and products are on the picture.
Explanation:
If we have the symmetrical alkene the addition of mercury and OH group is not regioselective but when we have more donors for one of Carbons in alkene then the OH group will go there.
