Answer:
Explanation:
The polarity of the 3 compounds would be in the order of
Ferrocene < Acetylferrocene < Diacetylferrocene
Your TLC data has to also support this observation . This can be checked by measuring the values of Rf ( Retention factor = distance travelled by solute/solvent ) .The Rf values also has to follow this particular order: -
Ferrocene > acetylferrocene > diacetylferrocene
2) Hexane happens to be a non-polar solvent. The polarity of hexane can be increased if some polar solvents for example, ethyl and methylene chloride etc are added
Therefore, in the increasing order of solvents polarity, we have
Hexane < 1:1 mixture of hexane: methylene chloride < 9:1 mixture of methylene chloride:
3) Chromatographic techniques all have a stationary phase in addition to a mobile phase. In the case of column chromatography, the silica gel will be the stationary phase and the solvent that will be poured will be the mobile phase.
4) The TLC and column chromatography both happen to have the same stationary phase which is the silica gel. Also, the same solvent mixture is used in both the techniques. This makes the result of the 2 to be almost the same. The difference seen between them is that, TLC works against the gravity while on the other hand column chromatography works in the direction of the gravity.
5) The key feature in the IR spectra of the acetylferrocene that will be absent in the spectra of ferrocene is the presence of carbonyl stretching frequency at close to 1700 per cm(cm-1). This peak is easily differentiated between both acetyl ferrocene and ferrocene.
Answer : The equilibrium constant for this reaction is, 
Explanation :
The given main chemical reaction is:
; 
The intermediate reactions are:
(1) 
; 
(2) 
; 
We are reversing reaction 1 and multiplying reaction 2 by 2 and then adding both reaction, we get:
(1) 
; 
(2) 
; 
Thus, the equilibrium constant for this reaction will be:
Thus, the equilibrium constant for this reaction is,
The equilibrium constant k is actually the ratio of the
concentration of the products over the concentration of reactants at equilibrium. So if the
concentration of products < concentration of reactants, therefore the
constant k will be small. But if the concentration of products >
concentration of reactants, the constant k will be large. In this case the
value is too small (x10^-19), therefore we can say that the reaction favors the
reactant side:
the equilibrium lies far to the left
<h3>
Answer:</h3>
42960 years
<h3>
Explanation:</h3>
<u>We are given;</u>
- Remaining mass of C-14 in a bone is 0.3125 g
- Original mass of C-14 on the bone is 80.0 g
- Half life of C-14 is 5370 years
We are required to determine the age of the bone;
- Remaining mass = Original mass × 0.5^n , where n is the number of half lives.
Therefore;
0.3125 g = 80.0 g × 0.5^n
3.90625 × 10^-3 = 0.5^n
- Introducing logarithm on both sides;
log 3.90625 × 10^-3 = n log 0.5
Solving for n
n = log 3.90625 × 10^-3 ÷ log 0.5
= 8
- Therefore, the number of half lives is 8
- But, 1 half life is 5370 years
- Therefore;
Age of the rock = 5370 years × 8
= 42960 years
Thus, the bone is 42960 years old
Answer:
polypeddite chain I guess
